Come On You Whites
May 25, 2013, 03:58:58 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Friends of Fulham goes mobile
 
  home page   Forums   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Fulham Academy attains Category 1 status  (Read 947 times)
LBNo11
Global Moderator
Gentleman Jim
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 6889


My memories in colour, my heart in Black & White..


WWW
« on: July 30, 2012, 05:22:26 pm »

Category One Status
Monday 30th July 2012
Join us    
More Sharing ServicesShare

The Club are delighted to announce that the Fulham Academy has been awarded Category One status under the new Elite Player Performance Plan (EPPP).

The EPPP is a Barclays Premier League initiative, backed by the Football League and Football Association, with the aim of revitalising youth football by developing areas such as coaching, education, welfare and medical care and providing greater opportunities for young players to progress.

Fulham are already one of the clubs leading the way at academy level having won their respective league title for the past two seasons and the national final last term. During the 2011/12 campaign Kerim Frei, Alex Kacaniklic, Tom Donegan, Neil Etheridge, Lauri Dalla Valle and Marcello Trotta all made their First Team debuts, with Buomesca Tue Na Bangna and Alex Brister involved in Martin Jol’s pre-season plans this year.  

As the Club look ahead to further success, fulhamfc.com caught up with Academy Director Huw Jennings, in the first of two interviews, to find out what the Category One status means for the future of the Club...

First of all Huw, congratulations to everyone that was involved in the Academy achieving Category One status - because after no end of preparation on your team’s part and a very stringent audit carried out by Double Pass (the League’s auditors for classification), this was the news that we were all hoping for...

It was, and first and foremost I would like to thank all the staff at the Academy who have worked tirelessly to make sure we achieved top status. The inspection took place over three days and it was a very thorough and exhaustive process. To complete the pre-inspection alone was a huge undertaking and took at least 80 days preparation. We were assessed in several areas including management, quality of coaching, education and welfare, recruitment, facilities and productivity – pleasingly they were very complimentary as we met what was needed. That was a massive boost and shows that we are heading in the right direction because out of the 23 clubs that applied for Category One status we were one of the first to be audited.

So what does our Category One status mean for the Academy and Club?

As fans are probably aware, the EPPP is a new system that has been introduced this season and basically it will categorise all professional football clubs for their youth programmes. That categorisation ranks from one to four, with one being the highest. So to be ranked in the top bracket is obviously great news for everyone associated with the Club, because the benefits in many ways are endless. One of the main benefits is that a Category One club gets the opportunity to play in a national games programme at Under-21, Under-18 and Under-16 level – providing a more competitive environment. Crucially, we will also retain the maximum funding level for our academy programme and over the next couple of years the funding to support that will increase as well. Then, on a playing front, we also have the added benefit that over time we will be able to sign players from further afield and spread our net more widely.

One of the key focuses of this re-structure is the long-term development of our young players as well isn’t it?

Well the idea is to develop more, and better, players for our First Team. Of course, over the past couple of seasons we have started to see some of our younger players make the step up, but we want to create a regular stream of future talent. The Category One status will allow us to give our boys an even more extensive programme by providing increased contact time for our players and coaches. With the success of our Coombe School programme in recent years, we are already in a good place in that sense, but I think we all know how important it is to give players more time with a ball and there will now be up to 12 hours of on-pitch coaching time per week for these players. The award will also demonstrate to our players and their parents that we have the best standards possible at Fulham and with the Category One licence granted for the next three years it is a chance to push on and do even better.

As part of the classification, there will also be a new Under-21 league which will be introduced to provide a competitive element within the new categories...

With the introduction of the EPPP, the creation of an Under-21 Barclays Premier Development League is just one of a number of changes that have been put into place ahead of the 2012/13 season. In essence it’s designed to bring together the country’s best young players in a competitive format – and for me, that was an important step. I think many clubs felt that the old reserve team system just wasn’t working. The Under-21 matches will mirror those of our Under-18s and Under-16s, which bring cohesion to the process. It’s a national programme and provisionally we will be in a group of seven which includes Chelsea, Manchester City, Liverpool, Middlesbrough, Crystal Palace and Wolves. Each team will be able to field three overage players as well, and an overage goalkeeper. It’s about providing a competitive environment and one that will hopefully provide a stepping stone to our First Team.

http://www.fulhamfc.com/Club/News/NewsArticles/2012/July/Category1Status.aspx
Logged

elgreenio
Legend
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1520


Football Manager Research. Twitter - @elgreeniouk


« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2012, 05:45:51 pm »

Massive starting point for the club. We're still a bit behind the game and need to carry on the investment instead of resting on the pittance we'll get from this though. Facilities are still far from what we should have.

We'll notice the affects more next season though as all clubs who applied for Cat 1 will play in our leagues this year due to some clubs not being audited yet.

Sent from my BlackBerry 9300 using Tapatalk
Logged
ScalleysDad
Legend
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1796



« Reply #2 on: July 30, 2012, 08:51:37 pm »

I remember the appointment of Huw Jennings getting a bit of a ripple when it was announced but the applause should be much louder now. One of the all time shrewd signings imho.
I hear what you say Mr Elgreenio about status and funding but every club I have ever worked with down these parts would kill for a pittance of funding. Argyle are on the eigth of nine lives, Torquay could yet falter, Exeter will rely heavily on selling out the derbies and Yeovil and Bristol Rovers are stalling. Five Clubs on the slide that would turn things around on a pittance.


not mean't to be a rant but pre season talk already is all about survival.
Logged
elgreenio
Legend
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1520


Football Manager Research. Twitter - @elgreeniouk


« Reply #3 on: July 31, 2012, 05:25:57 am »

Thing is that I'm not sure the scales are balanced enough. Yes the lower clubs will get funding, but they won't be getting as much compensation as is the current norm when their young players are poached by the bigger teams. Swings and roundabouts really. The FA seem to forget about these lower league clubs when making these decisions

Sent from my BlackBerry 9300 using Tapatalk
Logged
Lighthouse
Gentleman Jim
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8998



« Reply #4 on: July 31, 2012, 08:39:07 am »

Where were the celebrations when I achieved this status at her Majesty's pleasure? So unfair.
Logged

The above IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT. It is an opinion.
AlFayedsChequebook
Guest
« Reply #5 on: July 31, 2012, 08:52:58 am »

Thing is that I'm not sure the scales are balanced enough. Yes the lower clubs will get funding, but they won't be getting as much compensation as is the current norm when their young players are poached by the bigger teams. Swings and roundabouts really. The FA seem to forget about these lower league clubs when making these decisions

Sent from my BlackBerry 9300 using Tapatalk

Will there be Champ clubs with category 1 statuses?

This is a screw job on the current league clubs, but in terms of making the national team better, it was the right thing to do.
Logged
elgreenio
Legend
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1520


Football Manager Research. Twitter - @elgreeniouk


« Reply #6 on: July 31, 2012, 09:52:02 am »

Boro and Wolves so far. C.Palace would be if it weren't for them having two seperate training sites
Logged
Mr_Moon
Guest
« Reply #7 on: July 31, 2012, 12:00:35 pm »

In terms of making the national team better, it wouldn't be a bad place to start if clubs actually graduated English youngsters. Instead we've got a load of u18 footballers from all over Europe and the World who will never contribute to the national team. It's a shame, we're just producing players for other nations.

Logged
AlFayedsChequebook
Guest
« Reply #8 on: July 31, 2012, 12:07:57 pm »

In terms of making the national team better, it wouldn't be a bad place to start if clubs actually graduated English youngsters. Instead we've got a load of u18 footballers from all over Europe and the World who will never contribute to the national team. It's a shame, we're just producing players for other nations.



I think the key here is that Fulham can now source players from further afield.

In the past, Fulham have only been able to get British youngsters who live a certain distance away (90mins or something like that?) and we have been competing in the same area as Chelsea, Arsenal, Palace, Spurs, West Ham etc.

There was no such restriction on foreign players, so it is easy to grab them once they are getting near playing age.
Logged
Mr_Moon
Guest
« Reply #9 on: July 31, 2012, 12:18:39 pm »


I think the key here is that Fulham can now source players from further afield.

In the past, Fulham have only been able to get British youngsters who live a certain distance away (90mins or something like that?) and we have been competing in the same area as Chelsea, Arsenal, Palace, Spurs, West Ham etc.

There was no such restriction on foreign players, so it is easy to grab them once they are getting near playing age.

I know, but I'm saying it's wrong. I don't agree with it at all even if EU employment law allows clubs to do so. I value principle higher than whether Fulham might sign some Swedish kid.
Logged
AlFayedsChequebook
Guest
« Reply #10 on: July 31, 2012, 12:35:15 pm »


I think the key here is that Fulham can now source players from further afield.

In the past, Fulham have only been able to get British youngsters who live a certain distance away (90mins or something like that?) and we have been competing in the same area as Chelsea, Arsenal, Palace, Spurs, West Ham etc.

There was no such restriction on foreign players, so it is easy to grab them once they are getting near playing age.

I know, but I'm saying it's wrong. I don't agree with it at all even if EU employment law allows clubs to do so. I value principle higher than whether Fulham might sign some Swedish kid.

sorry, what I mean is that Fulham can get youngsters from further afield in the UK. They are dropping the 90 min rule so we will be able to get youngsters from outside London.
Logged
Jamie88
First Team
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 298



« Reply #11 on: July 31, 2012, 06:20:55 pm »

I assume there would be extra friendlies or other fixtures to compensate for the lack of teams in our group then no? It seems a very short season if they are to only be playing 12 league fixtures and some in the cup..
And I take it that the Under-18s will have a mirrored fixture list?

Oh..and hello everyone by the way, first post!  038
Logged
LBNo11
Global Moderator
Gentleman Jim
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 6889


My memories in colour, my heart in Black & White..


WWW
« Reply #12 on: July 31, 2012, 06:32:37 pm »

I assume there would be extra friendlies or other fixtures to compensate for the lack of teams in our group then no? It seems a very short season if they are to only be playing 12 league fixtures and some in the cup..
And I take it that the Under-18s will have a mirrored fixture list?

Oh..and hello everyone by the way, first post!  038


...welcome Jamie, please make sure it is not your only post, wide and varied opinion is the lifeblood of any forum...

 Welcome
Logged

Jamie88
First Team
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 298



« Reply #13 on: July 31, 2012, 06:42:37 pm »

I assume there would be extra friendlies or other fixtures to compensate for the lack of teams in our group then no? It seems a very short season if they are to only be playing 12 league fixtures and some in the cup..
And I take it that the Under-18s will have a mirrored fixture list?

Oh..and hello everyone by the way, first post!  038


...welcome Jamie, please make sure it is not your only post, wide and varied opinion is the lifeblood of any forum...

 Welcome

Ah don't worry, I think I'll be sticking around!
Logged
cmg
Legend
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1119



« Reply #14 on: July 31, 2012, 07:04:30 pm »


In terms of making the national team better, it wouldn't be a bad place to start if clubs actually graduated English youngsters. Instead we've got a load of u18 footballers from all over Europe and the World who will never contribute to the national team. It's a shame, we're just producing players for other nations.


Whilst appreciating the need to protect our own national interests (God knows, the England team needs an injection of young talent) I think we sometimes overreact to this as far as FFC is concerned, particularly in view of the fact that recent 'breakthrough' youngsters have, indeed tended to be overseas players.

However the following Development/Academy players are (as far as I can ascertain) English by birth: Bettinelli, Brister, Burn, Smith, Arthurworrey, Pritchard, Banya, Della Verde, Woodrow, Donegan, Sambou, Peniket. There may be others and there are, of course, also some Scots, Welsh and Irish representatives. We can't really be accused of neglecting domestic players.
Logged

The Inevitable Rule (applicable in all circumstances):"You have taken yourself too seriously."
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!