Author Topic: January  (Read 2189 times)

Offline Twig

  • cebu
  • *
  • Posts: 4074
Re: January
« Reply #30 on: December 05, 2017, 11:26:38 AM »
As to the OP, how much could we potentially spend within FFP, no idea but we must have some decent latitude.

Offline RaySmith

  • cebu
  • *
  • Posts: 4312
Re: January
« Reply #31 on: December 05, 2017, 12:30:40 PM »
We're definitely rubbish defensively at the moment, no doubt about that.

But is it the players we have, or our system? How can opponents cut straight through us and score from one of our attacks, like they Brentford did? The second goal was also sloppy defending.

Roy used to have us defending from the front. OK, so we play a far more adventurous system, that is great when it comes off, but we need to make it harder for teams  to score against us, while putting the chances we create away at the other end.

Maybe  new players would help, if we get the right ones in.

Offline toshes mate

  • Jimmy Hill
  • *
  • Posts: 2091
Re: January
« Reply #32 on: December 05, 2017, 01:03:47 PM »
So much defeatism 'the season is over' etc.  Why allow the recruitment team to get away with a poor January window because 'they are always difficult'?

The season isn't over by a long chalk and no window is destined to be poor unless you think that way. 

We just need to be much more positive about our Club and not let one forty five minute nightmare drown out the good things that have happened in 2017.


Offline Statto

  • cebu
  • *
  • Posts: 4144
Re: January
« Reply #33 on: December 05, 2017, 01:36:31 PM »
With Mackintosh in control of negotiations, our “summer” targets won’t be signed in the summer at all. They’ll be signed in Autumn, 5 or 6 games into the season, or alternatively we’ll be mugged off for an age then the deal won’t happen at all (remember Dunk, Mounie, Rolan, Kamara first time around, Cyriac first time around, and Gayle).

That being the case, IMO we have to get our key targets in January, irrespective of how expensive the January market is and how sure we are that this season is a write-off.

Online Woolly Mammoth

  • Moritz Volz
  • ***
  • Posts: 16324
Re: January
« Reply #34 on: December 05, 2017, 04:13:24 PM »
Well if we are going to write off this season after 20 matches, then life is not worth living and we may as well end it all now via Beachy Head.
I cannot understand the people who have surrendered and thrown the towel in.
We are not even half way through the season, do people realise that if Fulham limp towards the end of the season with its head in it’s hands, what the consequences will be.
The vultures are going to be circulating anyway, and if we look like a dead duck as well, we will not only lose our prize assets in the form of our key players, but also our credibility and stock.
You cannot concede that the season is over, and think by treading water until the summer is vision and foresight.
Because if you stand still you get overtaken.
I would like to think that some of you are made of sturdier stock than the players the club signed via their stats system.
Because sometimes you reap what you sow and get what you deserve.
So what are you, men or mice or do I need to throw down a piece of cheese to find out.
We may have hit the canvas, but it’s no knockout, just a little winded.
I always measure a manager and a player and a supporter and a Football Club how they get up off the floor, not how they go down.   
« Last Edit: December 05, 2017, 04:17:31 PM by Woolly Mammoth »
Its not the man in the fight, it's the fight in the man.  🐘

Offline MikeW

  • Graham Leggat
  • **
  • Posts: 792
Re: January
« Reply #35 on: December 05, 2017, 04:26:27 PM »
Thanks Twig for bringing the OP question back into focus:

Two thoughts - Does anyone know what we can spend (roughly) in Jan - irrespective of the reality?

Also, talk of Jan signings (which I support) does bring the focus back on the ever silent Messrs Talbot.  I sincerely hope they are beavering away pursuing the Coach's hit list of new talent.

One request though, please keep away from the French Div 2 and any Portugese Leagues!
"If you're sat in row Z and the ball hits your head, that's ........."


Offline YankeeJim

  • cebu
  • *
  • Posts: 4285
Re: January
« Reply #36 on: December 05, 2017, 05:13:44 PM »
So, to become a billionaire means being lucky? That might explain why you and I aren't billionaires. This is nonsense. Being in the right place at the right time can be luck. For example Fonte scoring. The difference between luck and skill is that Fonte has ceased scoring and Khan continues to make money. Mo's money, property and PR men ran the football side of FFC? I think not.
Running a multi billion dollar business requires a lot more ability than the bumper business. I know a lot about bumpers, having spent most of my life in some aspect of automotive repair business but I'm no where near  a billionaire. By your analogy, Mo's expertise in retail shouldn't have aided him in running FFC. Cream rises to the top. Be it bumpers or retail sales and hopefully history will repeat itself when it comes to football.

That's your view, certainly isn't mine, but you're entitled to it. All I'll say is it sounds awfully depressing to me to suggest the massive gap between your and Khan's respective success levels is down to an equally massive gap in your inherent personal abilities. If that's how you feel about yourself, so be it.

Khan had some success in the past, most of it in the 1980s probably, but these days does he even outperform the S&P500 year-on-year?

The whole point I'm making is MAF had extra people to whom he delegated running the club, rather than a naive belief that success in fashion retail/car bumpers qualified him as a football chairman.   

As to "cream" rising to the top, we'll see. Khan's record at Fulham thus far suggests he's far from the "cream" of football chairmen, more like the scum or sediment that sinks to the bottom.... which rather reinforces my view that he has no useful talent outside the car bumper sector.

Khan kept the football people. Do you honestly believe that Khan discovered and bought Mitroglu or McCormack or Martin or Fonte? As a side note, would experience in bumpers or retail help a person pick a football man? For that matter is success at football a guarantee that there will be success in the future? I give you Felix and Moyes. Both had prior success and failed in their next go round. I don't think that Sir Alex could have saved us from relegation. Success is as much a manner of thinking as it is anything else. Will Khan succeed? If I said the head of Tesco just bought Fulham, would you be happy? The point being that a non football person in a time of unlimited spending could buy a successful team. A second non football  person takes over in a time of controlled spending and gets an aged, run down and totally gutted team.....maybe timing and luck is the only answer. LOL 

I can agree with a little of what you say.
One of the issues I do disagree fervently is, that any number of managers I am sure would have saved us from relegation, including Ferguson, and that is the tragedy. We drew the short straw with one of worst errors of judgement this club has ever made in the form of Felix Wolfgang Magath.
But that is now water under the bridge, nothing can be done to erase that, until we get back to the Premier League, and if we are going to measure and judge Mr Khan, then this is where we get the tape measure out, if he can orchestrate our return to the Premier League.


No manager would have saved us. Mo had lost interest and gave no support to the club that last year and a half. We had no players except cast offs. Strategy, no matter how skillful, is going to make a difference over the course of a season if you don't have players. We didn't have Red Nose, we had Jol, a clueless and disheartened man the world has never known. Felix was a shot at desperation. His resume said he'd be good. I think we'll agree that his resume lied.  The problem wasn't Felix, he was simply another symptom. The problem began in Mo's neglect and was fueled by Jol's (and others) incompetence.  We now have Khan as the sole person responsible for our future. Hopefully he'll do for us what he has done this year in Jacksonville. I won't mentioned that it took more years than necessary to turn that team around. The fact that he did so gives me hope. Fulham has two types of fans. Those of us who hope and wish for better times and those who just enjoy the failures.
Its not that I could and others couldn't.
Its that I did and others didn't.

Offline Twig

  • cebu
  • *
  • Posts: 4074
Re: January
« Reply #37 on: December 05, 2017, 06:04:13 PM »
Thanks Twig for bringing the OP question back into focus:

Two thoughts - Does anyone know what we can spend (roughly) in Jan - irrespective of the reality?

Also, talk of Jan signings (which I support) does bring the focus back on the ever silent Messrs Talbot.  I sincerely hope they are beavering away pursuing the Coach's hit list of new talent.

One request though, please keep away from the French Div 2 and any Portugese Leagues!

Haha, I like the last sentence. As to the point about how much we could theoretically spend you would have to make some assumptions.  I'm no expert on FFP but as I understand, the limits involve averaging net spend over 3? years.  I have probably oversimplified but there are one or two on here who are experts on this.  My point is that if we were to spend up to some theoretical maximum then presumably you would have to assume were spent net zero for 2 1/2 yrs afterwards.  Is that right please? HELP!

Online Woolly Mammoth

  • Moritz Volz
  • ***
  • Posts: 16324
Re: January
« Reply #38 on: December 05, 2017, 06:08:37 PM »
So, to become a billionaire means being lucky? That might explain why you and I aren't billionaires. This is nonsense. Being in the right place at the right time can be luck. For example Fonte scoring. The difference between luck and skill is that Fonte has ceased scoring and Khan continues to make money. Mo's money, property and PR men ran the football side of FFC? I think not.
Running a multi billion dollar business requires a lot more ability than the bumper business. I know a lot about bumpers, having spent most of my life in some aspect of automotive repair business but I'm no where near  a billionaire. By your analogy, Mo's expertise in retail shouldn't have aided him in running FFC. Cream rises to the top. Be it bumpers or retail sales and hopefully history will repeat itself when it comes to football.

That's your view, certainly isn't mine, but you're entitled to it. All I'll say is it sounds awfully depressing to me to suggest the massive gap between your and Khan's respective success levels is down to an equally massive gap in your inherent personal abilities. If that's how you feel about yourself, so be it.

Khan had some success in the past, most of it in the 1980s probably, but these days does he even outperform the S&P500 year-on-year?

The whole point I'm making is MAF had extra people to whom he delegated running the club, rather than a naive belief that success in fashion retail/car bumpers qualified him as a football chairman.   

As to "cream" rising to the top, we'll see. Khan's record at Fulham thus far suggests he's far from the "cream" of football chairmen, more like the scum or sediment that sinks to the bottom.... which rather reinforces my view that he has no useful talent outside the car bumper sector.

Khan kept the football people. Do you honestly believe that Khan discovered and bought Mitroglu or McCormack or Martin or Fonte? As a side note, would experience in bumpers or retail help a person pick a football man? For that matter is success at football a guarantee that there will be success in the future? I give you Felix and Moyes. Both had prior success and failed in their next go round. I don't think that Sir Alex could have saved us from relegation. Success is as much a manner of thinking as it is anything else. Will Khan succeed? If I said the head of Tesco just bought Fulham, would you be happy? The point being that a non football person in a time of unlimited spending could buy a successful team. A second non football  person takes over in a time of controlled spending and gets an aged, run down and totally gutted team.....maybe timing and luck is the only answer. LOL 

I can agree with a little of what you say.
One of the issues I do disagree fervently is, that any number of managers I am sure would have saved us from relegation, including Ferguson, and that is the tragedy. We drew the short straw with one of worst errors of judgement this club has ever made in the form of Felix Wolfgang Magath.
But that is now water under the bridge, nothing can be done to erase that, until we get back to the Premier League, and if we are going to measure and judge Mr Khan, then this is where we get the tape measure out, if he can orchestrate our return to the Premier League.


No manager would have saved us. Mo had lost interest and gave no support to the club that last year and a half. We had no players except cast offs. Strategy, no matter how skillful, is going to make a difference over the course of a season if you don't have players. We didn't have Red Nose, we had Jol, a clueless and disheartened man the world has never known. Felix was a shot at desperation. His resume said he'd be good. I think we'll agree that his resume lied.  The problem wasn't Felix, he was simply another symptom. The problem began in Mo's neglect and was fueled by Jol's (and others) incompetence.  We now have Khan as the sole person responsible for our future. Hopefully he'll do for us what he has done this year in Jacksonville. I won't mentioned that it took more years than necessary to turn that team around. The fact that he did so gives me hope. Fulham has two types of fans. Those of us who hope and wish for better times and those who just enjoy the failures.

I totally disagree with you about the relegation season, and Magath who orchestrated our demise all on his own, the nightmare your mother told you about, and Khan gave him a licence to relegate Fulham FC, and the way he treated the senior professionals from Hangland downwards. This control freaks  training regimes and the medieval rules he imposed to ruin any team spirit, putting  Dan Burn at right back v Stoke, when 2 0 Up v Hull and proceeded to take a midfielder off, I think it was Scottie Parker and put Darren Bent on and we drew 2 2, Steve Bruce must have thought it was his birthday, that just 2 examples. Like many others I was in attendance for our last 9 matches Home and away, I saw it first hand at Motspur Park.
So urinating down my back and then telling me it’s raining, does not wash with me.
As for Khan, I have no faith in him either, he can charm some of the people some of the time, but not all of the people all of the time.
He is no football man, or Fulham supporter and never will be.
He clearly forgets that you cannot bull shite a bull shiter.
So we will have to agree to disagree on this occasion.
« Last Edit: December 05, 2017, 06:15:33 PM by Woolly Mammoth »
Its not the man in the fight, it's the fight in the man.  🐘


Offline YankeeJim

  • cebu
  • *
  • Posts: 4285
Re: January
« Reply #39 on: December 05, 2017, 09:51:20 PM »
Woolly, the team put on the filed by Jol and others was crap and they lost. Felix came in, put different crap on the field and we still lost. If Mo had stayed, we would still have been relegated. You can't redo two years of neglect with a management change. The team was well past its sell on date. So back to your next to last line. Cheers.
Its not that I could and others couldn't.
Its that I did and others didn't.

Offline FulhamStu

  • Graham Leggat
  • **
  • Posts: 998
Re: January
« Reply #40 on: December 05, 2017, 10:34:27 PM »
If the spend figures are calculated over 3 years, remember this is general loss so you have to factor wages as well as transfer money.  If we have been running at say £10m a year spend, but last year net 0, then we could blow £20M and recapture that the season after next by selling Sess.  Or to put it another way, risk blowing FFP with the knowledge that we could recapture a huge chunk by selling Sess sometime in the next 2 years.

Offline JoelH5

  • Legend
  • ***
  • Posts: 1395
Re: January
« Reply #41 on: December 05, 2017, 10:46:59 PM »
If the spend figures are calculated over 3 years, remember this is general loss so you have to factor wages as well as transfer money.  If we have been running at say £10m a year spend, but last year net 0, then we could blow £20M and recapture that the season after next by selling Sess.  Or to put it another way, risk blowing FFP with the knowledge that we could recapture a huge chunk by selling Sess sometime in the next 2 years.

If the rumours that we had an 18 million pound bid for Gayle turned down are true, I think that must have been the thinkin. Also, it’s bette to get someone in before you sell your asset as otherwise every selling club adds 20%(+) on the price
I was there, standing in the Putney end


Offline Statto

  • cebu
  • *
  • Posts: 4144
Re: January
« Reply #42 on: December 05, 2017, 11:04:07 PM »
If Mo had stayed, we would still have been relegated.

And if you throw an apple high enough, it will transform into a goose.
Of course I have no way of proving this wild statement but it's my opinion, I'm entitled to it, and I don't need to offer any evidence to support it.

Online Woolly Mammoth

  • Moritz Volz
  • ***
  • Posts: 16324
Re: January
« Reply #43 on: December 05, 2017, 11:36:28 PM »
Woolly, the team put on the filed by Jol and others was crap and they lost. Felix came in, put different crap on the field and we still lost. If Mo had stayed, we would still have been relegated. You can't redo two years of neglect with a management change. The team was well past its sell on date. So back to your next to last line. Cheers.

Jim, I still disagree with your opinion of the relegation year. Mo, he was getting on he wanted to sell up and had lost his appetite. Jol was feeding on scraps admittedly, but he had no stomach for a fight no desire, he took no interest what so ever in the Academy, he was thinking about his pension long before he was sacked, which was six months too late. A dead man walking and the Khans did not identify the signs that the manager they inherited was past his sell by date.
Didn’t they do any research or gather any information about Jol, obviously not. They were complete amateurs and still are. Their naivety is only surpassed by their arrogance.
Khan should have sacked Jol the moment he walked into Craven Cottage, but because Khan his son and his enterage did not know the difference between a football and a snowball, they oversaw error of judgement after error of judgement, and they had the arrogance to think they can walk into our club and run it their way, as if they thought they knew better.
No it was not Alfayeds fault, even though he wasn’t perfect.
 But the club were unnecessary relegated under Khan and the wise one Magath, and we are still paying the price.
« Last Edit: December 06, 2017, 09:53:42 AM by Woolly Mammoth »
Its not the man in the fight, it's the fight in the man.  🐘

Offline toshes mate

  • Jimmy Hill
  • *
  • Posts: 2091
Re: January
« Reply #44 on: December 06, 2017, 08:39:21 AM »
Jol was feeding on scraps admittedly, but he had no stomach for a fight no desire, he took no interest what so ever in the Academy, he was thinking about his pension long before he was sacked, which was six months too late.
I have to agree with you about Jol's delayed sacking, Woolly, but I was never happy about him arriving at Craven Cottage from the off because his best years were already a long way behind him.  One of MAF's less cogent decisions IMHO.