Friends of Fulham

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: SimonDaviesEnjoyer on July 18, 2026, 09:15:03 PM

Title: Rogers to Chelsea for 117m
Post by: SimonDaviesEnjoyer on July 18, 2026, 09:15:03 PM
I think this is an insane fee.

Just to stir the pot a bit, he had one fewer G+A last season than Wilson according to the site I was looking at. Also fits the HG mold.

Discuss.
Title: Re: Rogers to Chelsea for 117m
Post by: JimmyConway on July 18, 2026, 10:01:15 PM
Quote from: SimonDaviesEnjoyer on July 18, 2026, 09:15:03 PMI think this is an insane fee.

Just to stir the pot a bit, he had one fewer G+A last season than Wilson according to the site I was looking at. Also fits the HG mold.

Discuss.
Quite surprised as it looked like Arsenal were leading the chase. No CL for him at Chelsea so must be financial decision you would imagine?
Where does that leave Palmer? I would envisage he leaves and heads back north?
Title: Re: Rogers to Chelsea for 117m
Post by: Trusty Steed on July 18, 2026, 10:06:36 PM
It's absolutely crazy money? I was shocked at Gordon's fee, but this is a step further I feel. Over £100m should be for a real world beater, and Roger's is great, but not great enough to justify that fee I feel
Title: Re: Rogers to Chelsea for 117m
Post by: Jims Dentist on July 18, 2026, 10:11:04 PM
Crazy, and not really what they need, better defenders are needed more.


Title: Re: Rogers to Chelsea for 117m
Post by: FFC007 on July 18, 2026, 10:14:36 PM
Middlesbrough pocket £20.2m from this as well...

These sell on clauses might be a good idea Mr Khan!
Title: Re: Rogers to Chelsea for 117m
Post by: SP on July 18, 2026, 10:49:56 PM
Another player from the dog track fatigued before the new season,lovely.
Title: Re: Rogers to Chelsea for 117m
Post by: DadCreature on July 19, 2026, 01:04:00 AM
Much as I hate Chelsea, I'd take Palmer.
Title: Re: Rogers to Chelsea for 117m
Post by: EN1 FFC on July 19, 2026, 01:21:22 AM
I do hope they are going to have to pay VAT on top of that £117m  :slap:
Title: Re: Rogers to Chelsea for 117m
Post by: Jims Dentist on July 20, 2026, 02:08:26 PM
Quote from: EN1 FFC on July 19, 2026, 01:21:22 AMI do hope they are going to have to pay VAT on top of that £117m  :slap:
Don't give Reeves any new ideas.
Next thing you know clubs will have to pay capital gains tax on any profit made for selling players for more than they paid for them.🤫
Title: Re: Rogers to Chelsea for 117m
Post by: demeant0r on July 20, 2026, 02:13:50 PM
If Rogers is worth 117m what is our own Josh King worth?
Title: Re: Rogers to Chelsea for 117m
Post by: Deadcowboys on July 20, 2026, 02:23:00 PM
Quote from: demeant0r on July 20, 2026, 02:13:50 PMIf Rogers is worth 117m what is our own Josh King worth?

At the moment, not a huge amount. He has to step up this year & if he does, then he will be worth a significant amount.
Title: Re: Rogers to Chelsea for 117m
Post by: The Cravenette on July 20, 2026, 02:27:38 PM
Rogers and Palmer were both in the City Academy and are friends. They even share a goal celebration. I would be surprised if he is a Palmer replacement. He is just yet another example of a "big" club flexing their financial muscles.
Title: Re: Rogers to Chelsea for 117m
Post by: I Ronic on July 20, 2026, 08:54:13 PM
Quote from: Jims Dentist on July 20, 2026, 02:08:26 PM
Quote from: EN1 FFC on July 19, 2026, 01:21:22 AMI do hope they are going to have to pay VAT on top of that £117m  :slap:
Don't give Reeves any new ideas.
Next thing you know clubs will have to pay capital gains tax on any profit made for selling players for more than they paid for them.🤫

If that were the case, on current form we wouldn't fall foul of that trap often.
Title: Re: Rogers to Chelsea for 117m
Post by: Bassey the warrior on July 21, 2026, 11:05:02 AM
Confused by this move. Both Palmer and Rogers most effective as a 10. Wonder how Alonso is planning to accommodate both?