Genuinely can't believe the excruciating amount of negativity on this board at times. Best player we've had in a long time and we moan because he doesn't run about as much as the other player. There's always one scapegoat though isn't there.
For most of us the criticism of Berbatov is that he's being played too deep to do damage to the opposition.
As a result his effectiveness is being limited.
We are playing like donkeys on crack, without a brain, with no connection between each other. The football is abysmal at the moment.
Some of the negatively from the Offal does seem to have seeped over here. It didn't used to be so negative on here. Sure, there were, and are, dissenting voices but in a constructive manner.
Indeed we aren't playing well at all. But we have suffered a lot worse and a lot of you will know that. Surely Berbatov playing too deep is a tactical problem which Jol needs to sort out. The guy doesn't run about much but he is well known for that and we knew that when we signed him.
Yes, there is a lot of negativity about and there is also a lot of threads appearing now about the negativity. I'm not having a pop, but starting threads like this don't help. All they are do is adding fuel to the already burning fire.
Name when we have played worse. This is the sort of football played on the Sanchez era, and that we know was terrible. I'm not just negative, I'm making a fair point, if Jol sorts it out, great, but it just doesn't seem to be happening.
We played horribly in a couple of months period under Hughes mickybrown100. When we lost 3-1 at home to bottom of the league at the time West Ham we were playing awfully then. We will be fine this season, I'm not panicking that's for sure.
Quote from: Sanchezs Tactician on January 15, 2013, 07:29:04 PM
We played horribly in a couple of months period under Hughes mickybrown100. When we lost 3-1 at home to bottom of the league at the time West Ham we were playing awfully then. We will be fine this season, I'm not panicking that's for sure.
But, that was early on in he tenur, we started off slowly last season, but improved, and we were great early on this season, but we are getting worse. Historically, our managers start out rubbish, and get better. With Jol, we are getting worse, and with no financial support, Jol must be sacked.
Quote from: mickybrown100 on January 15, 2013, 07:31:24 PM
Quote from: Sanchezs Tactician on January 15, 2013, 07:29:04 PM
We played horribly in a couple of months period under Hughes mickybrown100. When we lost 3-1 at home to bottom of the league at the time West Ham we were playing awfully then. We will be fine this season, I'm not panicking that's for sure.
Indeed but Jol has shown signs of his managerial ability. Sack him? Very premature if you ask me.
But, that was early on in he tenur, we started off slowly last season, but improved, and we were great early on this season, but we are getting worse. Historically, our managers start out rubbish, and get better. With Jol, we are getting worse, and with no financial support, Jol must be sacked.
Quote from: mickybrown100 on January 15, 2013, 07:31:24 PM
Quote from: Sanchezs Tactician on January 15, 2013, 07:29:04 PM
We played horribly in a couple of months period under Hughes mickybrown100. When we lost 3-1 at home to bottom of the league at the time West Ham we were playing awfully then. We will be fine this season, I'm not panicking that's for sure.
But, that was early on in he tenur, we started off slowly last season, but improved, and we were great early on this season, but we are getting worse. Historically, our managers start out rubbish, and get better. With Jol, we are getting worse, and with no financial support, Jol must be sacked.
Or backed?