Saves of 2012/13 by Mark Schwarzer (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JP-oYJh7cis)
Ageism and a stupid manager in Jol has cost us dearly.
So you assume. It's quite likely that the reasons for his leaving us were more than ageism. There were the rumors of his having a clause in his contract that if he were fit he must start. If this is true, perhaps Fulham used their smarts for a change and deemed that too much of an ask at that point in his career. Perhaps he demanded other contratual terms (money, contract length, etc.) that Fulham couldnt in good conscience agree with.
Perhaps he's the reason we no longer hear about the chickens at Motspur :58:
If you had your way, the main training accessory would be a zimmer frame! (In response to original post)
Yeah yeah.
We all know you love Schwarzer and hate Jol.
Snore bore.
Get off this forum Bateman unless your going to post something that's positive every post you put up is full off crap.....and to be honest we don't need it at the moment or ever to that fact!!!!!
Quote from: Nick Bateman on March 25, 2014, 05:23:31 PM
Saves of 2012/13 by Mark Schwarzer (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JP-oYJh7cis)
Ageism and a stupid manager in Jol has cost us dearly.
You're not Mrs Schwarzer are you by any chance?
Each and every thread you post is seconds after that plug is pulled out of your arse fantasising about Schwarzer and getting one over on referees. Massive, enormous...gimp.
The reason we are failing this year is because of one piece of advice to Khan when he first took over and that was "we do not need to overhaul the squad this summer".
Guys and dolls,
Lets cut the personal abuse please or the thread gets it.
I had no real issue with Mark leaving. I felt his time was up and did not like the idea that he may have had a 100% start clause.
I don't think it matters one jot who would have been in Goal this season we would almost certainly be in bottom three anyway.
Burt, you need to have a quite word in Batemans ear it's his posts that's getting everyone's back up, every post he puts up has the same reaction. Cheers mate.
We are bottom of the league and that's a fact! Because you haven't analyzed the goals we conceded, so many were saveable it would have added enough points to make Fulham mid-table.
And your argument is so weak you resort to personal abuse to my valid point that a GREAT goalkeeper was given to Chelsea despite Jol's many post-match interviews where he praised Schwarzer's performance.
Spurs have kept their aging goalie (Brad Freidel) who is WORSE than Schwarzer, and Mark has been excellent in every game for our rivals this season.
I also thought that was a decent link to showing what we missed this season - some have forgotten.
I don't know why everyone keeps responding to these trolling posts.
A more obvious troll I have never seen!
I don't think it's a wind-up at all - Stek's two crucial mistakes against WBA and Cardiff away were absolutely critical - just think if we had got off to an away win at WBA in Magath's first game - that pathetic fumble was really costly
11 Players on the pitch. You cannot blame one player. The team has been poor. It's a team game!
I also think we've missed Mark's experience and reliability this season. He's not too old - for a keeper.
The idea was that Mark was coming to the end of his career, and wanted the nod to be our main keeper- but I doubt it would have been in his contract- and thus was allowed to go when Stek was brought in, who would obviously be number one after paying so much for him, and with his pedigree.
I think we've missed Mark a lot, and his absence has affected the back four, but it's hard to argue that this is the main reason for our demise, though I think it's a factor, and another example of misjudgement by the club.
Quote from: Tooting legend on March 25, 2014, 06:09:41 PM
Burt, you need to have a quite word in Batemans ear it's his posts that's getting everyone's back up, every post he puts up has the same reaction. Cheers mate.
I tend to agree with him, specially the Rooney stuff.
What am I missing?
We akk know why because we have all been watching. :dead horse:
Quote from: jarv on March 25, 2014, 09:47:51 PM
We akk know why because we have all been watching. :dead horse:
?
Quote from: LillieBoy on March 25, 2014, 09:30:00 PM
Quote from: Tooting legend on March 25, 2014, 06:09:41 PM
Burt, you need to have a quite word in Batemans ear it's his posts that's getting everyone's back up, every post he puts up has the same reaction. Cheers mate.
I tend to agree with him, specially the Rooney stuff.
What am I missing?
I am confused too
Lillieboy. One states one's opinion, an observation and it was the first time I'd seen that Schwarzer montage on Youtube and it reminded me of what has been missed.
At least
RaySmith has an intelligent cognizant point to make also.
QuoteI also think we've missed Mark's experience and reliability this season. He's not too old - for a keeper.
The idea was that Mark was coming to the end of his career, and wanted the nod to be our main keeper- but I doubt it would have been in his contract- and thus was allowed to go when Stek was brought in, who would obviously be number one after paying so much for him, and with his pedigree.
I think we've missed Mark a lot, and his absence has affected the back four, but it's hard to argue that this is the main reason for our demise, though I think it's a factor, and another example of misjudgement by the club.
As for "trolling", I have far better things to do than attempt to make cheap comments merely to get a reaction. I am just trying to make a point; the goalkeeper is the MOST important position and when Jol allowed him to leave I was truly gutted. One hoped Stekenleburg would be nearly as good but he was not and it took many gross errors for some Fulham followers to see this was the case, something I was lambasted for saying several months ago.
One thing we should all not forget is that we are all on the same side wanting Fulham to stay up: we simply have different ways of expressing it.
Quote from: F(f)CUK on March 25, 2014, 05:51:06 PM
The reason we are failing this year is because of one piece of advice to Khan when he first took over and that was "we do not need to overhaul the squad this summer".
DING DING DING!!!! WE HAVE A WINNAH!!!!
I think NB might be partially correct, as is F(f)CUK.
How many people on here would disagree with the statement that Jol let us down badly by purchasing/loaning aged players, and failed to let then youngsters come thru? From the stuff we saw on here during the Winter of Discontent we just went through, many of you, it seemed. Replacing Mark was just another facet of mismanagement at all levels. Right to point out how well he's done down the road for himself.
I, for one, would rather have still seen Mark and David between the sticks for us, but that's just my opinion.
And the author of this thread posted his opinion, and we ALL need to respect he has one. If you don't like an opinion, you have so many choices, the main two being put forwards a reasoned argument against it, or ignore it, but please don't get into this name-calling, if you feel so strongly do what other posters do, and inform the Mods, I have got emails on this tonight and that's why I'm on this thread, it works, so please let the Mods do their job without making it harder than it has to be, please.
I agree with everything Logicalman has said..... Nice post.
The goalkeeping issue is certainly an area that I share a similar view Nick, however I feel Jem has summed up the reason we are bottom perfectly.... We have been extremely poor as a team, and certain individuals have had incredibly disappointing seasons. I could name at least 6 players easily, who I feel have let Fulham down this season.
The goalkeeping is an area which has been poor granted, but I honestly feel Mark would have had the same problems with a terrible back four infront of him....
shwarzer is quality but the gamble on Stekelenburg to not be a psychological mess was worth four million. it may yet pay off... but for the time being Stockdale is the better option and I am grateful to Magath for having been clear minded enough to see why.
Schwarzer saved us many times, it cannot be denied. He is missed but his parting was mutual. He wanted playing time for the world cup and we could not guarantee that. He didn't get it but the prestige of Chelski is more than enough to warrant a call up. I am happy for the man and I am satisfied with Stockdale. There are larger problems.
Glad this board has a decent administration unlike the old official one.
Quote from: Nick Bateman on March 27, 2014, 12:01:43 AM
Glad this board has a decent administration unlike the old official one.
Thanks, but definitely not needed NB.
I'm going to go against the tide and disagree. There are things we miss: he was vocal and commanding as well as a natural agile shot stopper and usually very strong in the air. However he was woeful in distribution and for the first half of the season prone to potentially devastating errors most matches. The fact is he is near the end of his career and this was evident.
Stekelenburg has been a disappointment but I would argue he likely would've performed better had he had a longer run of consecutive games. He does offer many of the same attributes (unfortunately including regular errors) but added to that excellent distribution and he's younger.
Stockdale lacks the same presence in his area but he's been less error prone by and large, he also has good distribution.
I feel a loss of form for Riether and Hangeland has been far more devastating. The former was outstanding last season but very average this. Hangeland doesn't seem the same player and for me we need to start the process of Burn either playing alongside or taking over.
Quote from: The Moose on March 27, 2014, 03:23:41 AM
I feel a loss of form for Riether and Hangeland has been far more devastating. The former was outstanding last season but very average this. Hangeland doesn't seem the same player and for me we need to start the process of Burn either playing alongside or taking over.
Yes, Schwarzer had a more effective defence to protect him, whereas Stek has been scandalously unprotected. Reither was always strong in going forward, but prone to being exposed defensively - this season he has been a liability defensively (perhaps because of the overall lack of a defensive system). Brede has been in decline for 2 seasons. Hughes ditto and that partnership was the bedrock of our defence. Personally I don't miss Schwarzer's appalling distribution, and I think he was well past his prime. Remember too, that his occasional Chelsea appearances are with about the best defence in the world in front of him.
Quote from: Snibbo on March 27, 2014, 03:32:44 AM
Quote from: The Moose on March 27, 2014, 03:23:41 AM
I feel a loss of form for Riether and Hangeland has been far more devastating. The former was outstanding last season but very average this. Hangeland doesn't seem the same player and for me we need to start the process of Burn either playing alongside or taking over.
Yes, Schwarzer had a more effective defence to protect him, whereas Stek has been scandalously unprotected. Reither was always strong in going forward, but prone to being exposed defensively - this season he has been a liability defensively (perhaps because of the overall lack of a defensive system). Brede has been in decline for 2 seasons. Hughes ditto and that partnership was the bedrock of our defence. Personally I don't miss Schwarzer's appalling distribution, and I think he was well past his prime. Remember too, that his occasional Chelsea appearances are with about the best defence in the world in front of him.
I disagree about Riether. Sure he did get caught out of position but more often than not last season he made up ground and stopped the cross. He did some sterling defensive work and was in the tip three right backs in the league. That's no longer the case for some reason.
Quote from: Logicalman on March 26, 2014, 01:47:18 AM
And the author of this thread posted his opinion, and we ALL need to respect he has one. If you don't like an opinion, you have so many choices, the main two being put forwards a reasoned argument against it, or ignore it, but please don't get into this name-calling, if you feel so strongly do what other posters do, and inform the Mods, I have got emails on this tonight and that's why I'm on this thread, it works, so please let the Mods do their job without making it harder than it has to be, please.
I think one of the reasons NB winds people up is that he just bangs on about the same point over and over and over again. The first time he posted about Mark Schwarzer, most people responded with a reasoned argument. The second time he posted, people got a little annoyed as the point had already been thoroughly discussed. The third, fourth and fifth time he posted the exact same point, unsurprisingly people began to get a little bored and frustrated, and unfortunately personal abuse then began to get bandied about.
Everyone's entitled to their opinion, but what's the point of incessantly repeating that opinion, particularly when it's nonsense to start with?
He's right on Stek - his mistakes have been too costly
Some points need to be repeatedly repeated - like Mitroglou being a panic buy and complete waste of money that could have been used much more beneficially elsewhere if the board had planned better in advance
Quote from: gezkc on March 27, 2014, 12:32:29 PM
Quote from: Logicalman on March 26, 2014, 01:47:18 AM
And the author of this thread posted his opinion, and we ALL need to respect he has one. If you don't like an opinion, you have so many choices, the main two being put forwards a reasoned argument against it, or ignore it, but please don't get into this name-calling, if you feel so strongly do what other posters do, and inform the Mods, I have got emails on this tonight and that's why I'm on this thread, it works, so please let the Mods do their job without making it harder than it has to be, please.
I think one of the reasons NB winds people up is that he just bangs on about the same point over and over and over again. The first time he posted about Mark Schwarzer, most people responded with a reasoned argument. The second time he posted, people got a little annoyed as the point had already been thoroughly discussed. The third, fourth and fifth time he posted the exact same point, unsurprisingly people began to get a little bored and frustrated, and unfortunately personal abuse then began to get bandied about.
Everyone's entitled to their opinion, but what's the point of incessantly repeating that opinion, particularly when it's nonsense to start with?
Was not the case. I said different things regarding Stek, and different things about Schwarzer. Unlike some people on this message board, I do vary my arguments and points and only
reinforce my views with more examples, which is not simply repeating the same thing.
Some get 'wound up' because they have a very poor counter-point or do not wish to face the truth. I would love to be wrong and Stek be as good as Schwarzer was or better, but he is not even as good as Stockdale, and that sadly is saying something.
Schwarzer had a wonderful run at Fulham but was well past even his post-prime. Letting him walk and being disappointed with Stekelenburg are two entirely different discussions.
Our goalkeeping overall this season, from both Stek and Stock, has been decidedly mediocre. It's a "tribute" to how horrible some other parts of the team have been that this isn't even really a discussion point for why we are where we are at the moment.
Quote from: Baszab on March 27, 2014, 01:02:34 PM
He's right on Stek - his mistakes have been too costly
Some points need to be repeatedly repeated - like Mitroglou being a panic buy and complete waste of money that could have been used much more beneficially elsewhere if the board had planned better in advance
Someone on Twitter (can't remember who) mentioned that with the apparent bid for Finbogasson on deadline day may have been because Mitroglou as found to be carrying an injury that would take too long to heal. That was rejected but a striker was needed regardless, so we pressed on with the Greek.
Makes a fair bit of sense imo...
Quote from: Denver Fulham on March 27, 2014, 04:48:01 PM
Schwarzer had a wonderful run at Fulham but was well past even his post-prime. Letting him walk and being disappointed with Stekelenburg are two entirely different discussions.
When did this happen? Schwarzer was fantastic as the series of saves shows on that montage of 2012/2013. He was praised by everyone last season. He wasn't given a game this season but has been superb for Chelsea the few times they have used him.
Goalies actually get BETTER with age.
Quote from: The Moose on March 27, 2014, 03:23:41 AM
I feel a loss of form for Riether and Hangeland has been far more devastating. The former was outstanding last season but very average this. Hangeland doesn't seem the same player and for me we need to start the process of Burn either playing alongside or taking over.
This..... :plus one:
Quote from: God The Mechanic on March 27, 2014, 04:49:38 PM
Quote from: Baszab on March 27, 2014, 01:02:34 PM
He's right on Stek - his mistakes have been too costly
Some points need to be repeatedly repeated - like Mitroglou being a panic buy and complete waste of money that could have been used much more beneficially elsewhere if the board had planned better in advance
Someone on Twitter (can't remember who) mentioned that with the apparent bid for Finbogasson on deadline day may have been because Mitroglou as found to be carrying an injury that would take too long to heal. That was rejected but a striker was needed regardless, so we pressed on with the Greek.
Makes a fair bit of sense imo...
That's the risk you run by leaving it till the end of the window. It's happened before with Barrios, Stem (last January), Huddlestone, that guy from Marseille, Taylor and countless more.
Ultimately the desire to get a bargain has cost us dearly.
Quote from: Nick Bateman on March 27, 2014, 05:08:17 PM
Quote from: Denver Fulham on March 27, 2014, 04:48:01 PM
Schwarzer had a wonderful run at Fulham but was well past even his post-prime. Letting him walk and being disappointed with Stekelenburg are two entirely different discussions.
When did this happen? Schwarzer was fantastic as the series of saves shows on that montage of 2012/2013. He was praised by everyone last season. He wasn't given a game this season but has been superb for Chelsea the few times they have used him.
Goalies actually get BETTER with age.
Not when they're past 40. Schwarzer wasn't saving shots like he used to. The decline was obvious.
If you could "upgrade" to the former Dutch No. 1 who was 10 years younger, it was an absolute no-brainer. This season, anyway, Stek has been disappointing and much closer to his Roma form than anyone hoped.
All that said, our mediocre goalkeeping probably has been our smallest problem of about seven major ones this season.
Quote from: Nick Bateman on March 27, 2014, 05:08:17 PM
Quote from: Denver Fulham on March 27, 2014, 04:48:01 PM
Schwarzer had a wonderful run at Fulham but was well past even his post-prime. Letting him walk and being disappointed with Stekelenburg are two entirely different discussions.
When did this happen? Schwarzer was fantastic as the series of saves shows on that montage of 2012/2013. He was praised by everyone last season. He wasn't given a game this season but has been superb for Chelsea the few times they have used him.
Goalies actually get BETTER with age.
Got to say Nick, the guy made a few bloopers in his last season with us, his distribution was less than it should have been, but his saves were still superbe.