Friends of Fulham

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: @jolslover on August 29, 2016, 12:05:09 AM

Poll
Question: Which of these would you rather have Fulham sign?
Option 1: Chris Martin
Option 2: Cyriac and Enrich
Title: Striker Question
Post by: @jolslover on August 29, 2016, 12:05:09 AM
As Cyriac and Enrich would cost 3.5m+2.5m (6 mill combined) and Chris Martin would cost around 7 million,

Which would you rather have?
Title: Re: Striker Question
Post by: AlexW132 on August 29, 2016, 12:11:36 AM
Cyriac and Enrich so we have more depth
Title: Re: Striker Question
Post by: @jolslover on August 29, 2016, 12:50:43 AM
Quote from: Statto on August 29, 2016, 12:12:31 AM
Don't see why our budget would be limited to ?6/7m but if it was id rather take our chances on those two than Martin

Not limited to that, But just these (plus Gyan) are the only names we have been linked with
Title: Re: Striker Question
Post by: Sgt Fulham on August 29, 2016, 01:40:44 AM
Cyriac + Enrich every time. Martin just doesn't excite me despite a fairly decent goalscoring record, much like Rhodes. I would rather more mobile strikers, especially with the thrill of the unknown!
Title: Re: Striker Question
Post by: westcliff white on August 29, 2016, 07:09:59 AM
Martin doesn't excite me either, but is proven in the championship, so Martin and Cyriac for me
Title: Re: Striker Question
Post by: ffc73 on August 29, 2016, 07:24:40 AM
Cyriac + Enrich
Title: Re: Striker Question
Post by: b+w geezer on August 29, 2016, 09:12:47 AM
The team's remaining need is for what used to be called a 'centre forward.'  You can't be one of those if you are too small, so it's Enrich v Martin in the stakes on offer. If Enrich will score reasonably often in this league and also offer the kind of hold-up and linkup play that isn't part of Matt Smith's game (and that Cauley can't quite manage at this level), then his button should be clicked. If not, then it's visible both from stats and from Youtube that Martin was doing this consistently until this year. If a third person who in addition has searing pace then him instead.
Title: Re: Striker Question
Post by: Deeping_white on August 29, 2016, 11:22:21 AM
Cyriac + Martin, because you need two types of forward to allow for a plan B, and Martin has proven he can score in this league so it's not a huge gamble, and Cyriac has pace to burn
Title: Re: Striker Question
Post by: filham on August 29, 2016, 12:58:34 PM
I wonder how much money is left in the kitty, we need to spend big bucks on a striker , have we the funds?
Title: Re: Striker Question
Post by: cmg on August 29, 2016, 01:10:17 PM
The kitty should be able to stretch to Cyriac and Martin.

To me Martin is an expensive Nemanja Nikolic. Polish press reporting that Nikolic's two-goal performance yesterday was a 'farewell' but we seem to have missed that bus (if we were ever running after it).
Title: Re: Striker Question
Post by: The Rock on August 29, 2016, 05:00:53 PM
Quote from: Statto on August 29, 2016, 12:12:31 AM
Don't see why our budget would be limited to ?6/7m but if it was id rather take our chances on those two than Martin

Maybe you haven't heard, our owner doesn't spend. We will get nowhere close to spending the 12m we got for Ross on new strikers. Thus, I'd take any one of the 3 and be happy with it.