Friends of Fulham

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: LVBPTS on October 11, 2019, 03:43:12 PM

Title: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: LVBPTS on October 11, 2019, 03:43:12 PM
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/50018966

Title: Re: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: BigbadBillyMcKinley on October 11, 2019, 03:59:14 PM
Hes a child ffs. Seems extremely harsh given John Terry got less for racial abuse.
Title: Re: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: love4ffc on October 11, 2019, 04:02:32 PM
Sorry, but the kid needs to learn respect for others.  If his parents couldn't do it then maybe this will. 
Title: Re: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: Dr Quinzel on October 11, 2019, 04:39:24 PM
Can we move on? :dead horse:
Title: Re: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: Statto on October 11, 2019, 04:52:06 PM
Quote from: BigbadBillyMcKinley on October 11, 2019, 03:59:14 PM
Hes a child ffs. Seems extremely harsh given John Terry got less for racial abuse.

How is a two week suspension, when you're nowhere near the first team, a harsher sanction than a 4 match ban and £200k fine?

Also not sure I agree with the implication that using racially offensive language is worse than using an offensive term for a disabled person

A more appropriate comment might be, how come John Terry got a much harsher sanction for a similar offence?
Title: Re: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: BigbadBillyMcKinley on October 12, 2019, 10:16:00 PM
Quote from: Dr Quinzel on October 11, 2019, 04:39:24 PM
Can we move on? :dead horse:

My point is, everyone has called someone a mong, or used the term mong. Tiger Woods once said he was putting like a mong, he got ridiculed. But my point with the difference of Harvey Elliott and John Terry, is Terry was an adult. He knew what he was saying and any potential ramification on it. Harvey Elliott was 14, 15 at most. Every child says something stupid and un PC.
Title: Re: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: Dr Quinzel on October 12, 2019, 11:14:40 PM
Quote from: BigbadBillyMcKinley on October 12, 2019, 10:16:00 PM
Quote from: Dr Quinzel on October 11, 2019, 04:39:24 PM
Can we move on? :dead horse:

My point is, everyone has called someone a mong, or used the term mong. Tiger Woods once said he was putting like a mong, he got ridiculed. But my point with the difference of Harvey Elliott and John Terry, is Terry was an adult. He knew what he was saying and any potential ramification on it. Harvey Elliott was 14, 15 at most. Every child says something stupid and un PC.
And my point is that it is weird that people keep making threads about a child who left Fulham to play for a bigger club. Move on.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: ..FOF.. on October 13, 2019, 06:30:12 AM
When it comes to principle and attitude, 16 is not a child.

Just look at Ryan Sess and more than half of the world's population.
Title: Re: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: Mince n Tatties on October 13, 2019, 06:51:50 AM
According to one Liverpool site,a certain player says he needs a kick up the arse,the little p****.
For all his talent,I hope he isn't one of them that loses it amongst all the hype round him.
Its happened to better players than him.
Title: Re: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: hovewhite on October 13, 2019, 07:18:33 AM
Who is he,?
Title: Re: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: KJS on October 13, 2019, 08:24:51 AM
Quote from: hovewhite on October 13, 2019, 07:18:33 AM
Who is he,?

I actually hope to screws up and disappears so other young players may learn that they don't have to chase the money at a young age and give their parent clubs the service they owe them for nurturing the talents
Title: Re: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: OldBrownShoe on October 13, 2019, 08:47:52 AM
I blame the parents.
Title: Re: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: BigbadBillyMcKinley on October 13, 2019, 09:11:04 AM
Quote from: Dr Quinzel on October 12, 2019, 11:14:40 PM
Quote from: BigbadBillyMcKinley on October 12, 2019, 10:16:00 PM
Quote from: Dr Quinzel on October 11, 2019, 04:39:24 PM
Can we move on? :dead horse:

My point is, everyone has called someone a mong, or used the term mong. Tiger Woods once said he was putting like a mong, he got ridiculed. But my point with the difference of Harvey Elliott and John Terry, is Terry was an adult. He knew what he was saying and any potential ramification on it. Harvey Elliott was 14, 15 at most. Every child says something stupid and un PC.
And my point is that it is weird that people keep making threads about a child who left Fulham to play for a bigger club. Move on.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk



And my other point is, I quoted the wrong comment 🤣🤣 

I was supposed to quote Statto.....
Title: Re: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: One Martin Thomas on October 13, 2019, 09:23:13 AM
As long as it does not lower the compensation fee, not our problem now 🙄 !
Title: Re: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: fcfulham55 on October 13, 2019, 12:38:03 PM
He's going to be one of the best players of all time if he kicks the nonsense out and matures quickly.
Title: Re: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: sunburywhite on October 13, 2019, 04:05:40 PM
Mods

Can you please arrange for Harvey Elliott to be changed into Daffy Duck anytine it is typed the same way you arranged for g1ng@r to come out as Special one
Title: Re: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: ffc73 on October 13, 2019, 05:46:22 PM
Quote from: One Martin Thomas on October 13, 2019, 09:23:13 AM
As long as it does not lower the compensation fee, not our problem now 🙄 !

I noted in Liverpool's response that they made the point that the video was made before he signed for them & by default when he was a Fulham registered player. Not sure if this helps or hinders the compensation claim but I suspect both clubs will use every opportunity to inflate or deflate the claim
Title: Re: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: cookieg on October 13, 2019, 06:55:14 PM
I find it unbelievable that so many people can be so bitter towards a 16 year old who has been given the opportunity of a life time. Just get over it for god's sake he is a kid, even at 16. Surely there are far more important things to worry about.
Title: Re: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: Andy S on October 13, 2019, 10:12:10 PM
 Like? Just because a player moves on doesn't mean he's forgotten. If I like a player I follow his career
Title: Re: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: Dr Quinzel on October 14, 2019, 02:25:16 PM
Quote from: KJS on October 13, 2019, 08:24:51 AM
Quote from: hovewhite on October 13, 2019, 07:18:33 AM
Who is he,?

I actually hope to screws up and disappears so other young players may learn that they don't have to chase the money at a young age and give their parent clubs the service they owe them for nurturing the talents

Do you mean QPR then, because it wasn't us.

:dead horse: :dead horse: :dead horse:
Title: Re: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: love4ffc on October 14, 2019, 03:53:45 PM
I personally don't care if a player played, or still plays for Fulham.  The fact that a player acts the way Harvey does has no place in the game.  No matter what his age. 

Like others have stated.  Obviously, kids are raised differently.  That could not be anymore obvious when comparing the Sessegnon(s) and young Mr. Elliot. 
Title: Re: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: The Rational Fan on October 15, 2019, 09:15:56 AM
Could it be possible that Harvey Elliott has more footballing skills and less mental stability than Gazza?
Title: Re: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: Sting of the North on October 15, 2019, 09:51:11 AM
Quote from: The Rational Fan on October 15, 2019, 09:15:56 AM
Could it be possible that Harvey Elliott has more footballing skills and less mental stability than Gazza?

Most things are possible since Elliott is just 16. I do think however it is absolutely ridiculous to even try to compare the "mental stability" of a 16 year old kid with someone that has shown decades of mental issues and severe problem with alcohol addiction.
Title: Re: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: Dr Quinzel on October 15, 2019, 02:04:54 PM
Quote from: The Rational Fan on October 15, 2019, 09:15:56 AM
Could it be possible that Harvey Elliott has more footballing skills and less mental stability than Gazza?

Come on. Read that back to yourself. It doesn't deserve answering.
Title: Re: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: Logicalman on October 15, 2019, 05:30:41 PM
Quote from: FFC73 on October 13, 2019, 05:46:22 PM
Quote from: One Martin Thomas on October 13, 2019, 09:23:13 AM
As long as it does not lower the compensation fee, not our problem now 🙄 !

I noted in Liverpool's response that they made the point that the video was made before he signed for them & by default when he was a Fulham registered player. Not sure if this helps or hinders the compensation claim but I suspect both clubs will use every opportunity to inflate or deflate the claim

.. it more points to the fact that either Liverpool do not complete due diligence on their young signings (as they should have been checking his SM accounts for just thing kind of thing), or they did know about it and perhaps didn't consider it an issue, and therefore condoned it in some manner by signing him anyways.
Stupid comment for their spokesman to make, given he could have just not said anything.
Title: Re: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: Mince n Tatties on October 16, 2019, 07:27:15 AM
Going out on loan in January.
Tranmere Rovers are favourites.
Title: Re: Harvey Elliot Banned
Post by: MikeW on October 16, 2019, 02:57:14 PM
He'll get a good kickin' in that League.  Quite a few from his own players I suspect!