Chelsea 2-0 Fulham Saturday 30/08

[TC's Sporran]

poor scores for berge and lukic  according to google. 2.8 and 2.9/5

castangne similar and tete lowest of all 2.6

Have you watched the game? Berge and Lukic completely controlled the midfield and Tete and Castagne were really solid. In fact, pretty much everyone had superb games (especially in the first half).

sorry serbian but i don't listen to anything you say due to your bias.

[SerbianLad]

poor scores for berge and lukic  according to google. 2.8 and 2.9/5

castangne similar and tete lowest of all 2.6

Have you watched the game? Berge and Lukic completely controlled the midfield and Tete and Castagne were really solid. In fact, pretty much everyone had superb games (especially in the first half).

sorry serbian but i don't listen to anything you say due to your bias.

What bias? Anyone who watched the match, even if you're not a Fulham fan would say we dominated the midfield. Look at Chelsea's forum, they were saying the same thing.

What kind of bias would I have towards Berge, Tete and Castagne anyway (I don't think I'm biased towards Lukic either, but I guess that's what you're aiming at).

Btw, you're one of the most biased posters here. I've never seen you say anything bad about TC. The fact is, both Berge and Lukic are better options than TC at the moment. TC is a good option to have of the bench.

[Hatch007]

sorry serbian but i don't listen to anything you say due to your bias.

I can't work out if you're joking or genuinely accusing SL of bias 🤷🏻

For my mind SL is one of the most considered and eloquent (no mean feat in its own right given the second language issue) posters on here