Author Topic: Team in v QPR  (Read 903 times)

Offline Friendsoffulham

  • Administrator
  • The Bard/Corked Hat
  • *
  • Posts: 3081
Team in v QPR
« on: June 30, 2020, 05:30:25 PM »
Your Team to face QPR this evening is as follows:



Initial thoughts?


Online fulhamben

  • Moritz Volz
  • ***
  • Posts: 15273
Re: Team in v QPR
« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2020, 05:31:02 PM »
parker out

Offline KJS

  • Legend
  • ***
  • Posts: 1234
Re: Team in v QPR
« Reply #2 on: June 30, 2020, 05:32:20 PM »
Why is Arter selected again🙄


Online ByTheRiver

  • Graham Leggat
  • **
  • Posts: 641
Re: Team in v QPR
« Reply #3 on: June 30, 2020, 05:33:05 PM »
I'll take that. He's addressed the Bryan at LB issue. I think Arter has more to offer than some others on here, so worth another go to get back up to speed, and the front three pick themselves tonight. Decent line up.

I predict a good win and a decent performance.

Online grandad

  • Gentleman Jim
  • ***
  • Posts: 9334
Re: Team in v QPR
« Reply #4 on: June 30, 2020, 05:35:11 PM »
parker out

No, he will be in the dug out.

Offline Finnans Right Peg

  • tjl
  • *
  • Posts: 207
Re: Team in v QPR
« Reply #5 on: June 30, 2020, 05:35:36 PM »
He finally puts odoi left full and then leaves bryan out instead of having him on the wing .I only hope by doing this it means that the top 3 reid cav and knockheart should have freedom to rotate and go were they like


Online fulhamben

  • Moritz Volz
  • ***
  • Posts: 15273
Re: Team in v QPR
« Reply #6 on: June 30, 2020, 05:37:05 PM »
He finally puts odoi left full and then leaves bryan out instead of having him on the wing .I only hope by doing this it means that the top 3 reid cav and knockheart should have freedom to rotate and go were they like
lets hope so, because they are pretty crap at playing where parker wants them too. infact i hope the whole team ignores parker and just does what it wants, might have a chance then

Offline SP

  • Gentleman Jim
  • ***
  • Posts: 5054
  • Fulham debut 1970
Re: Team in v QPR
« Reply #7 on: June 30, 2020, 05:37:07 PM »
Not sure about playing Cav & Knockers together?  We've got to win the battle first.

Online grandad

  • Gentleman Jim
  • ***
  • Posts: 9334
Re: Team in v QPR
« Reply #8 on: June 30, 2020, 05:41:06 PM »
Please don´t play inverted wingers.


Offline filham

  • Mr Fayed
  • **
  • Posts: 12380
Re: Team in v QPR
« Reply #9 on: June 30, 2020, 05:41:38 PM »
Bryan had to go but thought Arter would go with him. Christie could provide much needed pace.

Really the team is as expected but can't see Reid scoring and who is expected to play right behind him, Arter or Cairney.

Time for Cav. and Knock to come up with the goals.

Online fulhamben

  • Moritz Volz
  • ***
  • Posts: 15273
Re: Team in v QPR
« Reply #10 on: June 30, 2020, 05:43:54 PM »
Bryan had to go but thought Arter would go with him. Christie could provide much needed pace.

Really the team is as expected but can't see Reid scoring and who is expected to play right behind him, Arter or Cairney.

Time for Cav. and Knock to come up with the goals.
its his brother in law, i said when we signed him it was a conflict of interest, and parkers proving me right. should never be allowed to sign family members

Offline sunburywhite

  • cebu
  • *
  • Posts: 4513
Re: Team in v QPR
« Reply #11 on: June 30, 2020, 05:48:36 PM »
Bryan had to go but thought Arter would go with him. Christie could provide much needed pace.

Really the team is as expected but can't see Reid scoring and who is expected to play right behind him, Arter or Cairney.

Time for Cav. and Knock to come up with the goals.
its his brother in law, i said when we signed him it was a conflict of interest, and parkers proving me right. should never be allowed to sign family members

Agree, just look at TK


Offline Tempest

  • Graham Leggat
  • **
  • Posts: 348
Re: Team in v QPR
« Reply #12 on: June 30, 2020, 05:49:09 PM »
Not actually fussed about the personnel, would be happy with 3 squirrels and a goat in the starting 11 if they were fitter than our players. P

Sent from my SM-N976B using Tapatalk


Offline sunburywhite

  • cebu
  • *
  • Posts: 4513
Re: Team in v QPR
« Reply #13 on: June 30, 2020, 05:49:24 PM »
Subs?

Online fulhamben

  • Moritz Volz
  • ***
  • Posts: 15273
Re: Team in v QPR
« Reply #14 on: June 30, 2020, 05:51:05 PM »


Online Dr Know

  • Graham Leggat
  • **
  • Posts: 493
Re: Team in v QPR
« Reply #15 on: June 30, 2020, 05:52:57 PM »
Subs?
They are on the original post .

Offline OdecaMynoT

  • Graham Leggat
  • **
  • Posts: 525
Re: Team in v QPR
« Reply #16 on: June 30, 2020, 05:53:04 PM »
Can't see where any goals will come from.

Stansfield not even on the bench.

I really thought/hoped he'd get a chance tonight.

Disappointed.

Offline OdecaMynoT

  • Graham Leggat
  • **
  • Posts: 525
Re: Team in v QPR
« Reply #17 on: June 30, 2020, 05:54:21 PM »
Not actually fussed about the personnel, would be happy with 3 squirrels and a goat in the starting 11 if they were fitter than our players. P

Sent from my SM-N976B using Tapatalk

 0001.jpeg :drums:


Online @jolslover

  • MAESTRO
  • **
  • Posts: 2756
Re: Team in v QPR
« Reply #18 on: June 30, 2020, 05:54:52 PM »
a lot of negativity on this post .. COYW

Offline alfie

  • Gentleman Jim
  • ***
  • Posts: 5111
Re: Team in v QPR
« Reply #19 on: June 30, 2020, 05:57:11 PM »
Goodness me, let them kick off before you crucify them.