NFR Come on you Irons!

[SP]

Shocking performance by WHU.

[Wingnut]

WHU don't look bothered.

[Baszab]

That needs investigating - WH never tried One iota
Disgraceful performance
Fabianski let  the shot in on purpose

[Sgt Fulham]

Shame, but has very little bearing on us. We need to do our business and then play a Grealish-less Villa next season.

[grandad]

We will just have to send them down next season.

[Fulham 442]

Shame, but has very little bearing on us. We need to do our business and then play a Grealish-less Villa next season.

That's why it said NFR in the title!

[Sgt Fulham]

Shame, but has very little bearing on us. We need to do our business and then play a Grealish-less Villa next season.

That's why it said NFR in the title!

It wasn't a dig at you or the thread, just in our hands to make it mean nothing.

[Luka]

Villa survived on the back of a Hawk eye/ VAR failure against Sheffield that gave them a point. And before I hear the "over the course of a season" argument
That can't apply to technology that has only failed once in a few seasons.
No human error just a travesty.

[SP]

And I still don't understand how VAR disallowed the Palace goal at Villa that would've made it 0-1.

[The Cravenette]

Villa survived on the back of a Hawk eye/ VAR failure against Sheffield that gave them a point. And before I hear the "over the course of a season" argument
That can't apply to technology that has only failed once in a few seasons.
No human error just a travesty.

I said this earlier in the thread. Bournemouth should sue Hawkeye!

[love4ffc]

Villa survived on the back of a Hawk eye/ VAR failure against Sheffield that gave them a point. And before I hear the "over the course of a season" argument
That can't apply to technology that has only failed once in a few seasons.
No human error just a travesty.

I said this earlier in the thread. Bournemouth should sue Hawkeye!

Think that would be an interesting lawsuit and one that could set a precedence for how technology is held accountable in the future of sports. 

[Andy S]

Watford played quite well except for the goals. It will be hard staying up there whoever gets promoted

[MikeTheCubed]

Wonder what if any impact Bournemouth's relegation has on our ability to sign Arter permanently (whether we'd want to is a debate in itself). Supposedly the loan agreement could be made permanent in the event of promotion, but hypothetically the clause could now be severed. The opposite could also be true in the event of Fulham failing to achieve promotion.

[peter w]

Villa survived on the back of a Hawk eye/ VAR failure against Sheffield that gave them a point. And before I hear the "over the course of a season" argument
That can't apply to technology that has only failed once in a few seasons.
No human error just a travesty.

I said this earlier in the thread. Bournemouth should sue Hawkeye!

Think that would be an interesting lawsuit and one that could set a precedence for how technology is held accountable in the future of sports.

Except, of course, that even without that point Villa would have stayed up on goal difference.

[Twig]

Why do we care?

[ProfficerFFC]

Villa survived on the back of a Hawk eye/ VAR failure against Sheffield that gave them a point. And before I hear the "over the course of a season" argument
That can't apply to technology that has only failed once in a few seasons.
No human error just a travesty.

I said this earlier in the thread. Bournemouth should sue Hawkeye!

Think that would be an interesting lawsuit and one that could set a precedence for how technology is held accountable in the future of sports.

Except, of course, that even without that point Villa would have stayed up on goal difference.

They wouldn't. Villa have a GD of -26 (-27 with that "goal") while Bournemouth have -25.