If Mitro stays

[blingo]

How badly is he going to want to score against Bournemouth?

[H4usuallysitting]

We should get 20+ goals out of him this coming season

[Plodder]

If he stays, he should be playing for the benefit of the club, not to resolve some kind of personal vendetta (if any exists), so he should be no more keen to score against Bournemouth than against anyone else in any other match.

[Southcoastffc]

If he stays, he should be playing for the benefit of the club, not to resolve some kind of personal vendetta (if any exists), so he should be no more keen to score against Bournemouth than against anyone else in any other match.

But he's human and it would be natural to try to prove a point.  In the same way, a significant number of Fulham supporters would be extremely pleased to do the double over Bournemouth aka Parker.

[Asotosyios]

If he stays, he should be playing for the benefit of the club, not to resolve some kind of personal vendetta (if any exists), so he should be no more keen to score against Bournemouth than against anyone else in any other match.

Or he could play for the benefit of the club in 44 games and for the club's benefit plus his own personal reasons against Bournemouth - nothing wrong with a player being extra motivated and committed.

[Nero]

If he stays, he should be playing for the benefit of the club, not to resolve some kind of personal vendetta (if any exists), so he should be no more keen to score against Bournemouth than against anyone else in any other match.

But he's human and it would be natural to try to prove a point.  In the same way, a significant number of Fulham supporters would be extremely pleased to do the double over Bournemouth aka Parker.

DOnt think we'll have a chance to do the double over parker. see him being sacked before we play them 2nd time

[Plodder]

If he stays, he should be playing for the benefit of the club, not to resolve some kind of personal vendetta (if any exists), so he should be no more keen to score against Bournemouth than against anyone else in any other match.

Or he could play for the benefit of the club in 44 games and for the club's benefit plus his own personal reasons against Bournemouth - nothing wrong with a player being extra motivated and committed.

Anyone playing for Fulham should be 100% motivated and committed for every game.  There is something wrong with a player being extra motivated and committed for a game against a particular team, fuelled by a personal vendetta, because by definition that means he is not giving that level of commitment in all the other games.

[Southcoastffc]

If he stays, he should be playing for the benefit of the club, not to resolve some kind of personal vendetta (if any exists), so he should be no more keen to score against Bournemouth than against anyone else in any other match.

Players or not emotionless automatons.
Or he could play for the benefit of the club in 44 games and for the club's benefit plus his own personal reasons against Bournemouth - nothing wrong with a player being extra motivated and committed.

Anyone playing for Fulham should be 100% motivated and committed for every game.  There is something wrong with a player being extra motivated and committed for a game against a particular team, fuelled by a personal vendetta, because by definition that means he is not giving that level of commitment in all the other games.

Players are not emotionless automatons.

[St Eve]

If he stays, he should be playing for the benefit of the club, not to resolve some kind of personal vendetta (if any exists), so he should be no more keen to score against Bournemouth than against anyone else in any other match.

Or he could play for the benefit of the club in 44 games and for the club's benefit plus his own personal reasons against Bournemouth - nothing wrong with a player being extra motivated and committed.

Anyone playing for Fulham should be 100% motivated and committed for every game.  There is something wrong with a player being extra motivated and committed for a game against a particular team, fuelled by a personal vendetta, because by definition that means he is not giving that level of commitment in all the other games.

Yes but in the real world that's not true. How often does a player returning to his previous club score

[Luka]

If he stays, he should be playing for the benefit of the club, not to resolve some kind of personal vendetta (if any exists), so he should be no more keen to score against Bournemouth than against anyone else in any other match.

He should but I hope that's not how he works. I do like a man that can hold a grudge.
Don't get mad get even Mitro.