Sky's coverage of Fulham is irritating....

[Nick Bateman]

...to say the least.

Seems both commentators want to see Fulham lose, perhaps because we are the favourites to win but one suspects another reason.

When a Fulham player is fouled they state "he wins the free kick" whereas when the opposition go down easily they say "clear foul" and even appeal the blatant dives.

Mitrovic's shirt very obviously pulled, Hinchcliffe remarks "bit of 50 and half a dozen" cliché.  If Mitro does anything it's how cynical a player he is.

Every team in the Championship will be overly physical as they know not to allow us to play proper football and Sky will be rooting them on. Perhaps they want a primitive team like WBA for the Premiership clubs to thrash every week not a genuine threat like Fulham.

[Sgt Fulham]

I was with you until the last line. Genuine threat lol

[Nick Bateman]

I mean genuine Premiership quality unlike Bournemouth, Blackbum or this lot.

[Sgt Fulham]

I mean genuine Premiership quality unlike Bournemouth, Blackbum or this lot.

That ended in 2013 I'm afraid. I know what you mean, but we need to earn that title back first.

[bahay18]

it was a dreadful game of football . a decent finish  for their goal , other wise i think they could both play until next monday and no one would score . im more upset about losing to a team with hourihane in it .

[Twig]

It wasn't Sky coverage that was irritating it was our poor football.

[bahay18]

yes and sky suggesting you had just witnessed a brazil 1970 master class from sheffield .

[Nick Bateman]

Why when I see the Sheffield United primordeal slopehead defenders one is reminded of "Wallace & Grommit"?