But if managers dropped players after a bad game or two, then they might be accused of not giving them a chance to prove themselves.
But managers do have favourites, I suppose, players they believe in, and keep giving a chance to, even if they performances lead to criticism of his selection.
Just reading Paul Merson's autobiographical 'Hooked,' and he says George Graham believed in him and gave him a chance, even when he wasn't that good at first. This was a manager who sold many 'stars' on taking over - like Rix and Charlie Nicholas, whom he accused of 'playing for their pension.'
Was Cairney fully fit anyway?
But agree we lacked creativity - TC's ability to look up, find a telling pass - our passing and crossing looked a bit all over the place, and often seemed rushed, compared to Coventry, who were so clinical in attack, and seemed to know exactly what they were doing.
We we were on the back foot right from the start, with only Ream offering some composure - could Cairney's experience and quality have added to that composure, and ability to take control of the game?