Coleman 2004-5. 13 games 14 points. DWLLLDWLLLWWL (W-4 D-2 L-7)
Coleman 2005-6. 13 games 12 points. DLLWDLLLDWLWL (W-3 D-3 L-7)
Coleman 2006-7. 13 games 17 points. LDWWDLDWDLWDL (W-4 D-5 L-4)
Sanchez 2007-8. 13 games 12 points. LWLLDDDDLDDWL (W-2 D-6 L-5)
Hodgson 2008-9. 13 games 18 points. LWWLLLDDWLWWD (W-5 D-3 L-5)
Hodgson 2009-10. 13 games 18 points. WLLWLLDWDWDLW (W-5 D-3 L-5)
Hughes 2010-11. 13 games 14 points. DDDWDDDLLWDLD (W-2 D-8 L-3)
Jol 2011-12. 13 games 12 points. DLLDDDWLLWLDD (W-2 D-6 L-5)
I reckon they all had the same "order" (i.e. strength of the opposition). Personally I find these types of statistics an example of the "you can drown in a lake of average 20cm depth" statistics...
Don't make nice reading does it.
Oh and we will drop a position today no matter the result at Wolves.
Jol has also had the luxury of extra Europa games to make his methods understood.
OR
Jol has had the problem of the Europa messing up his methods.
I forgot how crap we are at the beginning of the season.
If we had got the results we deserved at home to Everton and Spurs, the picture would be a bit rosier.
But life is full of "if only"s....
WN, you've got me properly worried now.
Well one thing is for sure, we are slow starters no matter who the manager is
So the difference between Hughes & Jol so far is Hughes drew 2 more games.
Of the 5 we have lost thus far, how many do you think we should have got something from on the balance of play (or would you normally have expected us to get anything from) -
Wolves - away
Newcastle - away
Stoke - away
Everton - home
Spurs - home
WN your mission now is game 14-26 results and then 27-38 so we get a full picture :-)
Quote from: White Noise on December 04, 2011, 04:22:25 PM
So the difference between Hughes & Jol so far is Hughes drew 2 more games.
Of the 5 we have lost thus far, how many do you think we should have got something from on the balance of play (or would you normally have expected us to get anything from) -
Wolves - away
Newcastle - away
Stoke - away
Everton - home
Spurs - home
Based on history we should have another 4 or 5 pts from those games.
Quote from: White Noise on December 04, 2011, 04:22:25 PM
So the difference between Hughes & Jol so far is Hughes drew 2 more games.
Of the 5 we have lost thus far, how many do you think we should have got something from on the balance of play (or would you normally have expected us to get anything from) -
Wolves - away
Newcastle - away
Stoke - away
Everton - home
Spurs - home
Wolves were on form when we played them- newcastle look good.
Stoke away is never easy, everton at home we should have won and spurs at home we did everything we could.
Quote from: White Noise on December 04, 2011, 04:22:25 PM
So the difference between Hughes & Jol so far is Hughes drew 2 more games.
Of the 5 we have lost thus far, how many do you think we should have got something from on the balance of play (or would you normally have expected us to get anything from) -
Wolves - away
Newcastle - away
Stoke - away
Everton - home
Spurs - home
We should have beaten Everton, and drawn with Spurs. Another 4 points.
We should have beaten Everton, and drawn with Spurs. Another 4 points.
[/quote]
And should have lost to Wigan. -3 points.
Jol is trying to change the age and playing style. Ignore statistics. Judge him after a year.
