Prem league: 4th Place Play-off

[Logicalman]

Interesting story here, and proposal. Personally, I cannot see why we need such play-offs. If a team finished fourth after playing 38 games in the season, that should be good enough. What's next? Play-offs for 1st and 2nd, then 2 and 3rd, etc, etc?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/eng_prem/8549867.stm


Premier League rejects fourth-place play-offs idea


The Premier League has revealed it will not pursue the idea of a play-off for fourth place and the final Champions League place.

At the Premier League board meeting on Thursday, the clubs' chairmen decided against looking into the proposal any further at this stage.

Manchester United, the dark side, Liverpool and Arsenal were reportedly quick to voice their opposition.

However, other clubs were keen on the idea in principle.

The idea, which was put forward at last month's meeting, was for automatic Champions League spots to go to the Premier League's top three teams, rather than the top four.
   
The sides finishing from fourth to seventh would then play in a mini knockout competition.

The proposal drew a mixed reaction from top-flight bosses, with Liverpool manager Rafael Benitez completely against it but Aston Villa boss Martin O'Neill described it as "interesting" and one that "people might go for".

Any change would have also needed the agreement of at least 14 of the 20 Premier League clubs, although there could not have been any changes for three years as the next TV deal is in place.

Premier League chief executive Richard Scudamore claimed there was "not enough support" for the proposal.

"The main topic of discussion was the Champions League play-off for that fourth qualifying place," he told BBC Radio 5 live.
   
"We gave a lot of discussion, a lot of detail, a lot of data. But there was not enough support to take the idea forward, so we won't be discussing that proposal any further."

However, West Ham chairman David Gold said the idea was scrapped mainly due to time constraints within the football calendar.

"It was just a physical thing, finding time in the calendar," said Gold. "We certainly looked at it and the board looked at it but said physically we just can't do it.

"The clubs that would be involved in a play-off could also be involved in the FA Cup and Champions League, so it just could not be done. They tried but it could not be done.

"It wasn't a question of being unanimous [in opposition to the idea] or not, there was not a date.

"The very top clubs are not keen on it and you can make a case that they are right.

"But there was a feeling in the room that a play-off could make the league more exciting and bring more clubs the possibility of getting into Europe.

"But the Premier League is the most exciting league that the world has ever known and no one is looking to damage that."

[finnster01]

I predicted that on another thread.

You need 14 votes. There are 20 teams in the Prem. There are the big 4's. that leaves 16. Man City is banking on breaking into that lot and has the funds. That leaves 15. Spurs and 'onest 'arry is a big spender and not interested. That leaves 14. West Ham and Trevor Brooking can be bought for a future favour to be had at a later date, and so on....

Never had a chance to pass.

[Logicalman]

I predicted that on another thread.

You need 14 votes. There are 20 teams in the Prem. There are the big 4's. that leaves 16. Man City is banking on breaking into that lot and has the funds. That leaves 15. Spurs and 'onest 'arry is a big spender and not interested. That leaves 14. West Ham and Trevor Brooking can be bought for a future favour to be had at a later date, and so on....

Never had a chance to pass.

Sorry Mr Finn, I looked but didn't see another thread on it. Thanks for the input however.

[HatterDon]

it was nearly as stupid an idea as the 39th match. The reason for it was obvious: the biggest money-making match in world football is the CCC playoff final. The EPL wants something similar to that.