News:

Use a VPN to stream games Safely and Securely 🔒
A Virtual Private Network can also allow you to
watch games Not being broadcast in the UK For
more Information and how to Sign Up go to
https://go.nordvpn.net/SH4FE

Main Menu


The 2016 Official Silly Summer Season Transfer Thread

Started by Friendsoffulham, May 04, 2016, 07:27:44 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

fulhamben

Quote from: @jolslover on August 25, 2016, 08:33:44 PM
Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 08:22:35 PM
Quote from: @jolslover on August 25, 2016, 08:11:19 PM
Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 07:30:23 PM
Quote from: Mince n Tatties on August 25, 2016, 07:28:29 PM
Please just sign a Striker before I go insane.I might
Even accept Bamford now (hang on second thoughts there) as
He'll be a loan.
stuff loans

So are you saying you wouldnt take Bamford now because it would be a loan???? I would be over the moon, Miles better than Woodrow and Smith. Top player
no i wouldnt want him. wasnt his last goal in april last year? nothing to say he could recapture that form 2 years ago.

he wasn't given a chance at two premier league clubs, but was great last time around in the championship. I dont understand who are you expecting us to sign.
I'm expecting us to sign anyone, after all we have lost Hugo mitroglu Ross and Dembele without a replacement. I'm not expecting us to fill that position with a temporary loan.  Anyway I doubt bamford would get past Kline after last year
CHRIS MARTIN IS SO BAD,  WE NOW PRAISE HIM FOR MAKING A RUN.

@jolslover

Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 08:41:56 PM
Quote from: @jolslover on August 25, 2016, 08:33:44 PM
Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 08:22:35 PM
Quote from: @jolslover on August 25, 2016, 08:11:19 PM
Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 07:30:23 PM
Quote from: Mince n Tatties on August 25, 2016, 07:28:29 PM
Please just sign a Striker before I go insane.I might
Even accept Bamford now (hang on second thoughts there) as
He'll be a loan.
stuff loans

So are you saying you wouldnt take Bamford now because it would be a loan???? I would be over the moon, Miles better than Woodrow and Smith. Top player
no i wouldnt want him. wasnt his last goal in april last year? nothing to say he could recapture that form 2 years ago.

he wasn't given a chance at two premier league clubs, but was great last time around in the championship. I dont understand who are you expecting us to sign.
I'm expecting us to sign anyone, after all we have lost Hugo mitroglu Ross and Dembele without a replacement. I'm not expecting us to fill that position with a temporary loan.  Anyway I doubt bamford would get past Kline after last year

What is your weird obsession against loans, If there are better options available on loan than on a permanent deal why wouldn't you pursue those options? Do you hate Kalas? Because hes no better than Cameron Burgess, Rather see our youth developed than sign an overrated youngster from a big club right??
STH H3

fulhamben

Quote from: @jolslover on August 25, 2016, 08:46:22 PM
Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 08:41:56 PM
Quote from: @jolslover on August 25, 2016, 08:33:44 PM
Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 08:22:35 PM
Quote from: @jolslover on August 25, 2016, 08:11:19 PM
Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 07:30:23 PM
Quote from: Mince n Tatties on August 25, 2016, 07:28:29 PM
Please just sign a Striker before I go insane.I might
Even accept Bamford now (hang on second thoughts there) as
He'll be a loan.
stuff loans

So are you saying you wouldnt take Bamford now because it would be a loan???? I would be over the moon, Miles better than Woodrow and Smith. Top player
no i wouldnt want him. wasnt his last goal in april last year? nothing to say he could recapture that form 2 years ago.

he wasn't given a chance at two premier league clubs, but was great last time around in the championship. I dont understand who are you expecting us to sign.
I'm expecting us to sign anyone, after all we have lost Hugo mitroglu Ross and Dembele without a replacement. I'm not expecting us to fill that position with a temporary loan.  Anyway I doubt bamford would get past Kline after last year

What is your weird obsession against loans, If there are better options available on loan than on a permanent deal why wouldn't you pursue those options? Do you hate Kalas? Because hes no better than Cameron Burgess, Rather see our youth developed than sign an overrated youngster from a big club right??
lol, so are you saying bamford is the best player we can get in the whole wide world. And I'd imagine kalas will be a bench boy soon. Unless ragnar turns out to be a flop. Loans have there uses. But not to fill a position that you have made best part of 20 million pound on in the last calendar year.
CHRIS MARTIN IS SO BAD,  WE NOW PRAISE HIM FOR MAKING A RUN.


@jolslover

Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 08:57:38 PM
Quote from: @jolslover on August 25, 2016, 08:46:22 PM
Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 08:41:56 PM
Quote from: @jolslover on August 25, 2016, 08:33:44 PM
Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 08:22:35 PM
Quote from: @jolslover on August 25, 2016, 08:11:19 PM
Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 07:30:23 PM
Quote from: Mince n Tatties on August 25, 2016, 07:28:29 PM
Please just sign a Striker before I go insane.I might
Even accept Bamford now (hang on second thoughts there) as
He'll be a loan.
stuff loans

So are you saying you wouldnt take Bamford now because it would be a loan???? I would be over the moon, Miles better than Woodrow and Smith. Top player
no i wouldnt want him. wasnt his last goal in april last year? nothing to say he could recapture that form 2 years ago.

he wasn't given a chance at two premier league clubs, but was great last time around in the championship. I dont understand who are you expecting us to sign.
I'm expecting us to sign anyone, after all we have lost Hugo mitroglu Ross and Dembele without a replacement. I'm not expecting us to fill that position with a temporary loan.  Anyway I doubt bamford would get past Kline after last year

What is your weird obsession against loans, If there are better options available on loan than on a permanent deal why wouldn't you pursue those options? Do you hate Kalas? Because hes no better than Cameron Burgess, Rather see our youth developed than sign an overrated youngster from a big club right??
lol, so are you saying bamford is the best player we can get in the whole wide world. And I'd imagine kalas will be a bench boy soon. Unless ragnar turns out to be a flop. Loans have there uses. But not to fill a position that you have made best part of 20 million pound on in the last calendar year.

Nah obviously there are better options, but a good option nonetheless, I think hes going to Burnley anyway. Kalas is very good in my opinion and fair enough, But dont dismiss players just because they would be signing on loan that is stupid
STH H3

fulhamben

Quote from: @jolslover on August 25, 2016, 09:02:21 PM
Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 08:57:38 PM
Quote from: @jolslover on August 25, 2016, 08:46:22 PM
Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 08:41:56 PM
Quote from: @jolslover on August 25, 2016, 08:33:44 PM
Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 08:22:35 PM
Quote from: @jolslover on August 25, 2016, 08:11:19 PM
Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 07:30:23 PM
Quote from: Mince n Tatties on August 25, 2016, 07:28:29 PM
Please just sign a Striker before I go insane.I might
Even accept Bamford now (hang on second thoughts there) as
He'll be a loan.
stuff loans

So are you saying you wouldnt take Bamford now because it would be a loan???? I would be over the moon, Miles better than Woodrow and Smith. Top player
no i wouldnt want him. wasnt his last goal in april last year? nothing to say he could recapture that form 2 years ago.

he wasn't given a chance at two premier league clubs, but was great last time around in the championship. I dont understand who are you expecting us to sign.
I'm expecting us to sign anyone, after all we have lost Hugo mitroglu Ross and Dembele without a replacement. I'm not expecting us to fill that position with a temporary loan.  Anyway I doubt bamford would get past Kline after last year

What is your weird obsession against loans, If there are better options available on loan than on a permanent deal why wouldn't you pursue those options? Do you hate Kalas? Because hes no better than Cameron Burgess, Rather see our youth developed than sign an overrated youngster from a big club right??
lol, so are you saying bamford is the best player we can get in the whole wide world. And I'd imagine kalas will be a bench boy soon. Unless ragnar turns out to be a flop. Loans have there uses. But not to fill a position that you have made best part of 20 million pound on in the last calendar year.

Nah obviously there are better options, but a good option nonetheless, I think hes going to Burnley anyway. Kalas is very good in my opinion and fair enough, But dont dismiss players just because they would be signing on loan that is stupid
i dissmissing him because he hasnt scored for a year and a half. but you didnt want to take that into account
CHRIS MARTIN IS SO BAD,  WE NOW PRAISE HIM FOR MAKING A RUN.

@jolslover

Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 09:05:02 PM
Quote from: @jolslover on August 25, 2016, 09:02:21 PM
Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 08:57:38 PM
Quote from: @jolslover on August 25, 2016, 08:46:22 PM
Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 08:41:56 PM
Quote from: @jolslover on August 25, 2016, 08:33:44 PM
Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 08:22:35 PM
Quote from: @jolslover on August 25, 2016, 08:11:19 PM
Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 07:30:23 PM
Quote from: Mince n Tatties on August 25, 2016, 07:28:29 PM
Please just sign a Striker before I go insane.I might
Even accept Bamford now (hang on second thoughts there) as
He'll be a loan.
stuff loans

So are you saying you wouldnt take Bamford now because it would be a loan???? I would be over the moon, Miles better than Woodrow and Smith. Top player
no i wouldnt want him. wasnt his last goal in april last year? nothing to say he could recapture that form 2 years ago.

he wasn't given a chance at two premier league clubs, but was great last time around in the championship. I dont understand who are you expecting us to sign.
I'm expecting us to sign anyone, after all we have lost Hugo mitroglu Ross and Dembele without a replacement. I'm not expecting us to fill that position with a temporary loan.  Anyway I doubt bamford would get past Kline after last year

What is your weird obsession against loans, If there are better options available on loan than on a permanent deal why wouldn't you pursue those options? Do you hate Kalas? Because hes no better than Cameron Burgess, Rather see our youth developed than sign an overrated youngster from a big club right??
lol, so are you saying bamford is the best player we can get in the whole wide world. And I'd imagine kalas will be a bench boy soon. Unless ragnar turns out to be a flop. Loans have there uses. But not to fill a position that you have made best part of 20 million pound on in the last calendar year.

Nah obviously there are better options, but a good option nonetheless, I think hes going to Burnley anyway. Kalas is very good in my opinion and fair enough, But dont dismiss players just because they would be signing on loan that is stupid
i dissmissing him because he hasnt scored for a year and a half. but you didnt want to take that into account

Original quote was "stuff loans" and you always seem to be negative about them. Bamford won championship player of the season 14/15 season. Has had 1 bad (didnt really play so dont know if you can call it bad) year in the premier league. He is great at this level.
STH H3


fulhamben

Quote from: @jolslover on August 25, 2016, 09:13:51 PM
Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 09:05:02 PM
Quote from: @jolslover on August 25, 2016, 09:02:21 PM
Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 08:57:38 PM
Quote from: @jolslover on August 25, 2016, 08:46:22 PM
Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 08:41:56 PM
Quote from: @jolslover on August 25, 2016, 08:33:44 PM
Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 08:22:35 PM
Quote from: @jolslover on August 25, 2016, 08:11:19 PM
Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 07:30:23 PM
Quote from: Mince n Tatties on August 25, 2016, 07:28:29 PM
Please just sign a Striker before I go insane.I might
Even accept Bamford now (hang on second thoughts there) as
He'll be a loan.
stuff loans

So are you saying you wouldnt take Bamford now because it would be a loan???? I would be over the moon, Miles better than Woodrow and Smith. Top player
no i wouldnt want him. wasnt his last goal in april last year? nothing to say he could recapture that form 2 years ago.

he wasn't given a chance at two premier league clubs, but was great last time around in the championship. I dont understand who are you expecting us to sign.
I'm expecting us to sign anyone, after all we have lost Hugo mitroglu Ross and Dembele without a replacement. I'm not expecting us to fill that position with a temporary loan.  Anyway I doubt bamford would get past Kline after last year

What is your weird obsession against loans, If there are better options available on loan than on a permanent deal why wouldn't you pursue those options? Do you hate Kalas? Because hes no better than Cameron Burgess, Rather see our youth developed than sign an overrated youngster from a big club right??
lol, so are you saying bamford is the best player we can get in the whole wide world. And I'd imagine kalas will be a bench boy soon. Unless ragnar turns out to be a flop. Loans have there uses. But not to fill a position that you have made best part of 20 million pound on in the last calendar year.

Nah obviously there are better options, but a good option nonetheless, I think hes going to Burnley anyway. Kalas is very good in my opinion and fair enough, But dont dismiss players just because they would be signing on loan that is stupid
i dissmissing him because he hasnt scored for a year and a half. but you didnt want to take that into account

Original quote was "stuff loans" and you always seem to be negative about them. Bamford won championship player of the season 14/15 season. Has had 1 bad (didnt really play so dont know if you can call it bad) year in the premier league. He is great at this level.
and thats another thing. if a player who hasnt had a decent pre season takes ages to get up to speed, then how long does it take a player who hasnt had a decent pre season, or played much in a whole year? we need a striker now. not one who may be ready within the month. and yes stuff loans. we have spent too many years thinking short term and we nearly ended up in the third division. slavisa is building a good young squad who can go from strength to strength in the next couple of years, and i want us to have to just  fine tune in windows, not rebuild your first 11 every year
CHRIS MARTIN IS SO BAD,  WE NOW PRAISE HIM FOR MAKING A RUN.

BestOfBrede

This thread, originally about rumours associated with this great club, has become a waste of space banter thread between just a handful of posters and their opinions!

Maybe next window we should have 2 transfer threads:
1/ Rumours
2/ Peoples opinions

Just a suggestion not an insult
049:gif

fulhamben

Quote from: BestOfBrede on August 25, 2016, 09:31:46 PM
This thread, originally about rumours associated with this great club, has become a waste of space banter thread between just a handful of posters and their opinions!

Maybe next window we should have 2 transfer threads:
1/ Rumours
2/ Peoples opinions

Just a suggestion not an insult
049:gif
did the silly in the title, not give it away ;)
CHRIS MARTIN IS SO BAD,  WE NOW PRAISE HIM FOR MAKING A RUN.


BestOfBrede

Hi Ben, not attempting to disrupt the banter...
But I, and possibly others, look at this thread every few mins to hope for rumours/ news, but I find we have a rumour followed by many posts of people's opinions why rumoured player is either too good for us, too expensive, crap, hasn't scored in the last 5 mins, has a bad attitude (just like Ross! Hee, hee) etc
I don't think there's anything wrong with that as that's what this board is for, just wish they were separated that's all - then we can choose
049:gif

I'm well excited with what Slavisa is doing and feel really positive. Whoever he brings in is fine with me. I feel some comments should be separated and then we can choose to read or not read. I feel for some players as they are completely slagged off and all they need is support.

Anyway, I'm doing exactly what I said shouldn't happen in this thread - sorry!

twang

Sorry if this has already been posted but Neeskens Kebane came on for Genk in the 74th minute as they were cruising their tie. Isn't that extremely weird on their part to risk the whole deal for nothing?

Fulham Tup North

Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 09:34:22 PM
Quote from: BestOfBrede on August 25, 2016, 09:31:46 PM
This thread, originally about rumours associated with this great club, has become a waste of space banter thread between just a handful of posters and their opinions!

Maybe next window we should have 2 transfer threads:
1/ Rumours
2/ Peoples opinions

Just a suggestion not an insult
049:gif
did the silly in the title, not give it away ;)
Don't blame us, it's that bloody Mince n Tatties who keeps mentioning the word Striker!!
We try to raise the standard but he just drags it back down again.. Just ask Fulhamben, he will tel you!!
"Whether you think you can or you think you can't,....you're right"


fulhamben

Quote from: twang on August 25, 2016, 09:49:02 PM
Sorry if this has already been posted but Neeskens Kebane came on for Genk in the 74th minute as they were cruising their tie. Isn't that extremely weird on their part to risk the whole deal for nothing?
swansong perhaps
CHRIS MARTIN IS SO BAD,  WE NOW PRAISE HIM FOR MAKING A RUN.

fulhamben

Quote from: Fulham Tup North on August 25, 2016, 09:52:39 PM
Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 09:34:22 PM
Quote from: BestOfBrede on August 25, 2016, 09:31:46 PM
This thread, originally about rumours associated with this great club, has become a waste of space banter thread between just a handful of posters and their opinions!

Maybe next window we should have 2 transfer threads:
1/ Rumours
2/ Peoples opinions

Just a suggestion not an insult
049:gif
did the silly in the title, not give it away ;)
Don't blame us, it's that bloody Mince n Tatties who keeps mentioning the word Striker!!
We try to raise the standard but he just drags it back down again.. Just ask Fulhamben, he will tel you!!
CHRIS MARTIN IS SO BAD,  WE NOW PRAISE HIM FOR MAKING A RUN.

f321ffc



Sergi Enrich Confirmed by Sky Spanish correspondent Guillem Balague on Twitter but tweet disappeared soon after, said all happened very quickly agreed and medical today will sign tomorrow.
Growing old is mandatory
Growing up is optional


fulhamben

Quote from: Statto on August 25, 2016, 09:53:26 PM
Quote from: twang on August 25, 2016, 09:49:02 PM
Sorry if this has already been posted but Neeskens Kebane came on for Genk in the 74th minute as they were cruising their tie. Isn't that extremely weird on their part to risk the whole deal for nothing?

I posted about this yesterday and said I assumed we'd have to do the medical all over again. But now I've thought about it I'm going to completely contradict myself and say it's not really much different to signing a player and then loaning him back to the selling club for a short while, like we were hoping spurs would do with dembele in january. Albeit in this case we've only loaned him back for one game (well, 16 minutes it seems)
yes id imagine the main part of the medical is to pick up on really dodgy stuff through scans and xrays, the type of thing that wont really get effected by one game unless something obvious happens during that game like a big impact injury
CHRIS MARTIN IS SO BAD,  WE NOW PRAISE HIM FOR MAKING A RUN.

Fulham76

Quote from: Statto on August 25, 2016, 09:53:26 PM
Quote from: twang on August 25, 2016, 09:49:02 PM
Sorry if this has already been posted but Neeskens Kebane came on for Genk in the 74th minute as they were cruising their tie. Isn't that extremely weird on their part to risk the whole deal for nothing?

I posted about this yesterday and said I assumed we'd have to do the medical all over again. But now I've thought about it I'm going to completely contradict myself and say it's not really much different to signing a player and then loaning him back to the selling club for a short while, like we were hoping spurs would do with dembele in january. Albeit in this case we've only loaned him back for one game (well, 16 minutes it seems)

The reason/rumour I heard why he returned to Belgium was because when he arrived we tried to change terms of what was agreed with him personally & his current club...

They got peed off & called him back apparently.

fulhamben

Quote from: Fulham76 on August 25, 2016, 09:58:49 PM
Quote from: Statto on August 25, 2016, 09:53:26 PM
Quote from: twang on August 25, 2016, 09:49:02 PM
Sorry if this has already been posted but Neeskens Kebane came on for Genk in the 74th minute as they were cruising their tie. Isn't that extremely weird on their part to risk the whole deal for nothing?

I posted about this yesterday and said I assumed we'd have to do the medical all over again. But now I've thought about it I'm going to completely contradict myself and say it's not really much different to signing a player and then loaning him back to the selling club for a short while, like we were hoping spurs would do with dembele in january. Albeit in this case we've only loaned him back for one game (well, 16 minutes it seems)

The reason/rumour I heard why he returned to Belgium was because when he arrived we tried to change terms of what was agreed with him personally & his current club...

They got peed off & called him back apparently.
didnt his manager say something different though?
CHRIS MARTIN IS SO BAD,  WE NOW PRAISE HIM FOR MAKING A RUN.


Fulham76

Quote from: fulhamben on August 25, 2016, 10:01:51 PM
Quote from: Fulham76 on August 25, 2016, 09:58:49 PM
Quote from: Statto on August 25, 2016, 09:53:26 PM
Quote from: twang on August 25, 2016, 09:49:02 PM
Sorry if this has already been posted but Neeskens Kebane came on for Genk in the 74th minute as they were cruising their tie. Isn't that extremely weird on their part to risk the whole deal for nothing?

I posted about this yesterday and said I assumed we'd have to do the medical all over again. But now I've thought about it I'm going to completely contradict myself and say it's not really much different to signing a player and then loaning him back to the selling club for a short while, like we were hoping spurs would do with dembele in january. Albeit in this case we've only loaned him back for one game (well, 16 minutes it seems)

The reason/rumour I heard why he returned to Belgium was because when he arrived we tried to change terms of what was agreed with him personally & his current club...

They got peed off & called him back apparently.
didnt his manager say something different though?

Maybe. I've no idea what's going on

Mince n Tatties