whilshire or RLC

[Jeroen]

If they were on the same wages, who would you rather have?
RLC on a loan or Whilshire on a free?!?!

[FFC1987]

Not even close. Loftus Cheek.

[fulhamben]

'Its a good question. Wiltshire was absolute class in his prime for arsenal. Such a shame the injuries have ravaged his career. But I agree with ffc1987. Rlc is what we need

[Tabby]

Ruben Loftus-Cheek has had one bad injury, Wilshere is made of glass.

[sunburywhite]

I am excited if we sign RLC, he is class above anything we have

[Bassey the warrior]

I am excited if we sign RLC, he is class above anything we have

Same level as Anguissa.

[RufusBrevettatemyhamster]

Both on £150k a week. RLC has a nasty achilles injury and Wilshere is just Mr Glass Jr. Both different players as well but not what we need.

Having said that, RLC all the way.

[Neutral Zone Ultra]

Loftus Cheek no question

[Craven Mad]

RLC would be a huge signing for us. Always been impressed by him when I've seen him play - great talent.

[Deeping_white]

Anyone that would take Wilshire needs testing for insanity, he could've been decent but his legs are made of the most brittle substance known to man

[Nero]

Get both might get a season between them

[shepperton white]

A win win situation for both - we get the benefit of his quality and hopefully survival, and he gets his full fitness back and gets his Chelsea and England place back.  Be interesting to see how the finances have panned out

[shepperton white]

Sorry - i was of course talking RLC

[AnOldBrownie]

If healthy...not even close.   As a matter of fact, if it weren't for injury concerns he'd get good minutes starting on Chelsea...and they are stacked.

RLC...all day...if healthy.