Man City Vs Fulham Sky Highlights

[Steeeeeeeeeed]

https://youtu.be/egVbIur9vQo?si=6Ps4dLd7tqusdj1p

[filham]

Make no mistake we were well and truly given a good hiding but by the best team in the league by far.
However surely their second goal was offside and it didn't need VAR to confirm it.
If goals like that are to be allowed then at our next free kick within 25 yards of goal we should line up six players on the goal line and jus hit the ball at one of them.

[Sgt Fulham]

Haaland really is a monster. He'd solve a lot of our issues, that's for sure!

[Lighthouse]

I always say to myself. What of the decisions were the other way. Well no penalty and no goal for the offside.

So 3-1 against the beast side is probably not bad with the week we had.

[copthornemike]

Could be worse according to a Chelsea fan!

[Ludlow Richard]

I've seen their penalty several times and I can't decide if Alvarez was tripped or whether he just took a theatrical dive.  Views from the collective welcome.

[MisfitKid]

I've seen their penalty several times and I can't decide if Alvarez was tripped or whether he just took a theatrical dive.  Views from the collective welcome.

Clearly a dive, trips over the ball...
And no one brings up their first goal, Haaland is offside.

[SerbianLad]

I've seen their penalty several times and I can't decide if Alvarez was tripped or whether he just took a theatrical dive.  Views from the collective welcome.

Watching live I thought it was soft. After watching MOTD, it seemed like a dive. Either way, I think there was much more contact on Wilson in the first half, so if that was a penalty that should have been a red for Rodri in the first half.

[3rdgenfan]

I've seen their penalty several times and I can't decide if Alvarez was tripped or whether he just took a theatrical dive.  Views from the collective welcome.

Watching live I thought it was soft. After watching MOTD, it seemed like a dive. Either way, I think there was much more contact on Wilson in the first half, so if that was a penalty that should have been a red for Rodri in the first half.
[/quote

I've seen their penalty several times and I can't decide if Alvarez was tripped or whether he just took a theatrical dive.  Views from the collective welcome.

Watching live I thought it was soft. After watching MOTD, it seemed like a dive. Either way, I think there was much more contact on Wilson in the first half, so if that was a penalty that should have been a red for Rodri in the first half.

No mention of the pull back on Wilson on MOTD and a just a cursory mention that the City goal was clearly offside.

Had that been the other way it would have been a good five minutes of analysis of why it was offside.

Linekar just laughed it off!!

[Watford_fc]

I've seen their penalty several times and I can't decide if Alvarez was tripped or whether he just took a theatrical dive.  Views from the collective welcome.

Watching live I thought it was soft. After watching MOTD, it seemed like a dive. Either way, I think there was much more contact on Wilson in the first half, so if that was a penalty that should have been a red for Rodri in the first half.
[/quote

I've seen their penalty several times and I can't decide if Alvarez was tripped or whether he just took a theatrical dive.  Views from the collective welcome.

Watching live I thought it was soft. After watching MOTD, it seemed like a dive. Either way, I think there was much more contact on Wilson in the first half, so if that was a penalty that should have been a red for Rodri in the first half.

No mention of the pull back on Wilson on MOTD and a just a cursory mention that the City goal was clearly offside.

Had that been the other way it would have been a good five minutes of analysis of why it was offside.

Linekar just laughed it off!!

Compare that reaction to let's say the Liverpool red cards in recent weeks.

Is that because the decision "only" affected a non top 6 side so didn't matter as much in their eyes .