News:

Use a VPN to stream games Safely and Securely 🔒
A Virtual Private Network can also allow you to
watch games Not being broadcast in the UK For
more Information and how to Sign Up go to
https://go.nordvpn.net/SH4FE

Main Menu


Winter Silly Season Transfer Thread 2025/2026

Started by FFC007, September 02, 2025, 10:26:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

@jolslover

Quote from: hopper on December 15, 2025, 03:38:36 PMI like Kean from what I've seen, his goals last season demonstrated great movement and instinctive finishing. I probably agree with jayffc's valuation range. I definitely think he could do well here.

25 goals across all comps last season for Fiorentina + 7 goals for Italian national team, would definitely bring something different to our current strikers. I think he would be a good signing and add some speed to our attack and I know Silva is a big fan (signed him to Everton when he was manager)
STH H3

C Block

How about Gift Orban, only 23yrs old, all his best years in front of him,
Nigerian, but hasn't been included in their AFCON squad,
Wouldn't cost a lot and I'd assume he already knows some of our squad,
With money tight he might be a good option.

hopper

Quote from: C Block on December 16, 2025, 04:14:18 PMHow about Gift Orban, only 23yrs old, all his best years in front of him,
Nigerian, but hasn't been included in their AFCON squad,
Wouldn't cost a lot and I'd assume he already knows some of our squad,
With money tight he might be a good option.

There's something that seems off about Orban, despite having a fairly reasonable goal return he gets moved along by clubs as soon as they can get shot.


FFC1987

If they go down, I wouldn't mind us looking at Tanaka at Leeds to be honest.

Deeping_white

Quote from: C Block on December 16, 2025, 04:14:18 PMHow about Gift Orban, only 23yrs old, all his best years in front of him,
Nigerian, but hasn't been included in their AFCON squad,
Wouldn't cost a lot and I'd assume he already knows some of our squad,
With money tight he might be a good option.

He's on loan at Verona who have an option to buy him so a non-starter




Hugh Janus

Heard today from a Palace mate that seems to hear all the gossip at the club but we are in touch with Will Hughes.

hopper

Quote from: Hugh Janus on December 18, 2025, 08:37:38 PMHeard today from a Palace mate that seems to hear all the gossip at the club but we are in touch with Will Hughes.

Unfashionable but very good player. A nightmare to play against on his day. Bit of a McGinn type.


HV71

Quote from: Hugh Janus on December 18, 2025, 08:37:38 PMHeard today from a Palace mate that seems to hear all the gossip at the club but we are in touch with Will Hughes.

" steptoe " would not excite me . Has he ever scored for Palace ? He is also 30

St Eve

Quote from: Hugh Janus on December 18, 2025, 08:37:38 PMHeard today from a Palace mate that seems to hear all the gossip at the club but we are in touch with Will Hughes.
No thanks

jayffc

Quote from: Hugh Janus on December 18, 2025, 08:37:38 PMHeard today from a Palace mate that seems to hear all the gossip at the club but we are in touch with Will Hughes.

As a cheap alternative backup to reed and TC likely departing in the summer 🤷I mean , if it fills a squad gap with an inexpensive professional player with experience whilst we also add to it a bigger signing at DM then I can see the logic, he's getting more game time than those two at palace and has played well against us a number of times I've seen him.

 Uninspiring, but could be part of a balanced wage book/squad I suppose, if only him
...not so much.

Rather take a punt on just giving Ridgeon game time though tbh.


C Block

Quote from: Hugh Janus on December 18, 2025, 08:37:38 PMHeard today from a Palace mate that seems to hear all the gossip at the club but we are in touch with Will Hughes.
Not.a.chance

Nero

Whose going to sign when the manager has only 6 months left on his contract?

JimmyConway

Quote from: Hugh Janus on December 18, 2025, 08:37:38 PMHeard today from a Palace mate that seems to hear all the gossip at the club but we are in touch with Will Hughes.
Nothing against him personally and might there be a link from Watford days with Marco? Not sure? but we need to generate pace in midfield and Hughes would be possibly slower than anything we currently have. Think it's clear we need box to box type who offers a bit of everything and not sure Will Hughes fits that bill?


hopper

We have no idea if there's anything in it really, I really think it's the kind of player fans don't want but we need.

We lack a horrible bastard in the team that winds up the opposition, and gets in faces, constantly harrying and making small fouls if needed.

I think there's a feeling we are too nice and lack a bit of streetwise-ness and intensity at times. Hughes would give us exactly that.

HV71

Is Lukic "nice " ? Don't think so but Berge probably is. Will Hughes is a good player - no doubt about that but we need to add goals and assists from midfield . In his last 76 league appearances 0 goals and 4 assists. Add to the fact that he is 30 years old - the only reason we are likely to be interested is that he may be available and cheap.

hopper

Quote from: HV71 on December 19, 2025, 10:18:25 AMIs Lukic "nice " ? Don't think so but Berge probably is. Will Hughes is a good player - no doubt about that but we need to add goals and assists from midfield . In his last 76 league appearances 0 goals and 4 assists. Add to the fact that he is 30 years old - the only reason we are likely to be interested is that he may be available and cheap.

Lukic isn't nice as such but he's not a pain in the ass. I never see him wind up opposition or effectively disrupt the flow and dynamic of the game to our favour. He'll chip in with the odd tactical foul. Hughes is more like AP. Think of McGinn, you always go away infuriated by how annoying he is, and that kind of thing can be really meaningful - especially in away games.

He wouldn't be the answer to goals as you say, but considering I think we need at least 2 midfielders long term, I'd certainly take it. Whenever I watch Palace he's always impressed me as a good player who goes under the radar, but is loved by the fans of the club he plays for.


Jim©

Quote from: hopper on December 19, 2025, 10:53:19 AM
Quote from: HV71 on December 19, 2025, 10:18:25 AMIs Lukic "nice " ? Don't think so but Berge probably is. Will Hughes is a good player - no doubt about that but we need to add goals and assists from midfield . In his last 76 league appearances 0 goals and 4 assists. Add to the fact that he is 30 years old - the only reason we are likely to be interested is that he may be available and cheap.

Lukic isn't nice as such but he's not a pain in the ass. I never see him wind up opposition or effectively disrupt the flow and dynamic of the game to our favour. He'll chip in with the odd tactical foul. Hughes is more like AP. Think of McGinn, you always go away infuriated by how annoying he is, and that kind of thing can be really meaningful - especially in away games.

He wouldn't be the answer to goals as you say, but considering I think we need at least 2 midfielders long term, I'd certainly take it. Whenever I watch Palace he's always impressed me as a good player who goes under the radar, but is loved by the fans of the club he plays for.

I think that's exactly what he did at Newcastle, nibbled, pulled, tackled, barged, slid in, got physical. So much so that when he went off at half time, we completely and utterly lost the MF battle. Lukic would, 100%, be an absolute PITA to play against.

hopper

Quote from: Jim© on December 19, 2025, 11:07:23 AM
Quote from: hopper on December 19, 2025, 10:53:19 AM
Quote from: HV71 on December 19, 2025, 10:18:25 AMIs Lukic "nice " ? Don't think so but Berge probably is. Will Hughes is a good player - no doubt about that but we need to add goals and assists from midfield . In his last 76 league appearances 0 goals and 4 assists. Add to the fact that he is 30 years old - the only reason we are likely to be interested is that he may be available and cheap.

Lukic isn't nice as such but he's not a pain in the ass. I never see him wind up opposition or effectively disrupt the flow and dynamic of the game to our favour. He'll chip in with the odd tactical foul. Hughes is more like AP. Think of McGinn, you always go away infuriated by how annoying he is, and that kind of thing can be really meaningful - especially in away games.

He wouldn't be the answer to goals as you say, but considering I think we need at least 2 midfielders long term, I'd certainly take it. Whenever I watch Palace he's always impressed me as a good player who goes under the radar, but is loved by the fans of the club he plays for.

I think that's exactly what he did at Newcastle, nibbled, pulled, tackled, barged, slid in, got physical. So much so that when he went off at half time, we completely and utterly lost the MF battle. Lukic would, 100%, be an absolute PITA to play against.

I really like Lukic, still feel we could use this profile of player. Definitely feel on the whole we're too nice still as a squad.