Opinions on Ince?

[davew]

Ask a sensible question and get the same old response from the same old knockers to my comments, I can ride above those! First impressions of a new player are important and what most fans think about. boy on this forum some players are great 1 week and should be castrated the next week! If life was about consistency I would still be married to my first wife.

[davew]

At least I can sleep well tonight knowing that nearly everybody who posted about my topic on the midfield selection agreed with me, what did the knockers have to say on that 1, absolutely nothing just silence! Are we all supporting the same team or just disagreeing with each other for the sake of it! 

[davew]

As usual people judging after not even 2 full games!!!!

I have never judged 1 person after 6 games, just given an opinion and an open question, not a judgement!!

[westcliff white]

For me Ince is a decent player, was at Brighton and before that too. He is not a world beater but solid and does his job. Fully expect him to start tonight over Parker, as I cannot see Parker playing two game sin 3 days and still being ready for Saturday.

[Rupert]

No wonder others call us Tarquin and Rupert.

And the problem there is what, exactly?

[Chutney]

Very similar to Etuhu, slightly more athletic, has all the attributes to be a very solid DM, now we just need a new Danny Murphy....

[TheBadger]

First impressions against Derby were good I think, he broke up play and did the simple things well - I was one of a fair few sitting around me that were surprised when he was taken off at half time and even more so when SJ advised later on that it was tactical. Didn't have enough time against QPR at the weekend to influence the game at all but early signs would suggest that he should be a good addition in a dimension that we have lacked for a while. Only time will tell though and as MJG said above, we cannot judge on 58 minutes worth of play.

[J]

Most importantly he looks like a step up on Matilla the Hun, young too with lots of potential

[Peabody]

No wonder others call us Tarquin and Rupert.

And the problem there is what, exactly?

Oops, sorry, I just forgot how to spell Periquin

[Rupert]

No wonder others call us Tarquin and Rupert.

And the problem there is what, exactly?

Oops, sorry, I just forgot how to spell Periquin

Just so you know, Tarquin is getting pretty miffed at these constant digs too. His name dates back to the kings of Rome and he says he is minded to give the next mickey-taker a damned good thrashing.

[Peabody]

No wonder others call us Tarquin and Rupert.

And the problem there is what, exactly?

Oops, sorry, I just forgot how to spell Periquin

Just so you know, Tarquin is getting pretty miffed at these constant digs too. His name dates back to the kings of Rome and he says he is minded to give the next mickey-taker a damned good thrashing.

So, have I got this right, it could have been Julius Tarquin rather than Ceasar then?

[ealex40]

58 minutes, that's right 58 minutes we have seen of him. No one can make a call based on that.

Absolutely correct. He was OK V Hull and coming on so late into a game like that is always a problem. By the time you start to get into the swing of it, the game is over. I think he will be a good signing but really need to see a bit more of him.

He hadn't yet signed for us when we played against Hull.

[Rupert]

No wonder others call us Tarquin and Rupert.

And the problem there is what, exactly?

Oops, sorry, I just forgot how to spell Periquin

Just so you know, Tarquin is getting pretty miffed at these constant digs too. His name dates back to the kings of Rome and he says he is minded to give the next mickey-taker a damned good thrashing.

So, have I got this right, it could have been Julius Tarquin rather than Ceasar then?

No, no, no!

Please take this seriously, Tarquin is a major mover in the Kew Gardens circle and has, if I understand the parlance, a posse at his call if needed, and he says you are on your final warning.

The Kings of Rome pre-date the empire by several hundred years. After the last of the legendary kings (called Tarquin, naturally) the Romans tried a republic, before opting for an empire.
Julius got the chop because Brutus et al thought he was going to have himself crowned king.

[filham]

Of course it is too early to say how good he will be for us but at least we can see that he has the physique.
He may have difficulty getting game time, we looked good on Saturday without a defensive midfielder and then Tunnicliffe may be back in contention soon.

[Peabody]

No wonder others call us Tarquin and Rupert.

And the problem there is what, exactly?

Oops, sorry, I just forgot how to spell Periquin

Just so you know, Tarquin is getting pretty miffed at these constant digs too. His name dates back to the kings of Rome and he says he is minded to give the next mickey-taker a damned good thrashing.

So, have I got this right, it could have been Julius Tarquin rather than Ceasar then?

No, no, no!

Please take this seriously, Tarquin is a major mover in the Kew Gardens circle and has, if I understand the parlance, a posse at his call if needed, and he says you are on your final warning.

The Kings of Rome pre-date the empire by several hundred years. After the last of the legendary kings (called Tarquin, naturally) the Romans tried a republic, before opting for an empire.
Julius got the chop because Brutus et al thought he was going to have himself crowned king.

Will you please tell Tarquin that he should be confronting Wearetherangersboys concerning this abuse of his name and not have a vendetta against me.