Can We Still Get Any Loans In?

[Mince n Tatties]

Like a big bruising Striker (as he ain't using Smith)
A goalie who would have saved them 2 yesterday.
Someone who can shoot from 30 yards like other
players do against us.
Or is it too late..

[Lighthouse]

According to a paper we are letting Smith go to Wolves to allow us to bring in Sone Aluko from Hull as this is the last week of loans.

[Mince n Tatties]

According to a paper we are letting Smith go to Wolves to allow us to bring in Sone Aluko from Hull as this is the last week of loans.
[/quote

Aluko is quick,another option I suppose.
Was regular at Hull before injured last season.

[MJG]

Yes we can,  but I wonder if numbers wise we have to let one go out to get one in under the restrictions

[H4usuallysitting]

I can lend them a fiver

[H4usuallysitting]

According to a paper we are letting Smith go to Wolves to allow us to bring in Sone Aluko from Hull as this is the last week of loans.

Can't be the same Smith that can't get in our team

[Mince n Tatties]

According to a paper we are letting Smith go to Wolves to allow us to bring in Sone Aluko from Hull as this is the last week of loans.
[/quote


Can't be the same Smith that can't get in our team

And I bet if it's correct he Bangs a few in for them.

[Riversider]

What I found very frustrating at the time and said so on here was the loan signing of Chris Baird,
Why ?
Against Burnley the other night we had Richards, Ream and Baird all on the bench, again why ?
Under what circumstances would you need all 3 when you've already got 3 centre half's on the pitch,
Baird for me was a massive waste of a loan signing for me, he wasn't better than what we already head, so why bring him in ?
We needed match winners and he doesn't fit that bill,
Wouldn't think for a minute that Jokanovic even knew who he was so who had the idea to sign him ? Can only be Rigg.

[@jolslover]

What I found very frustrating at the time and said so on here was the loan signing of Chris Baird,
Why ?
Against Burnley the other night we had Richards, Ream and Baird all on the bench, again why ?
Under what circumstances would you need all 3 when you've already got 3 centre half's on the pitch,
Baird for me was a massive waste of a loan signing for me, he wasn't better than what we already head, so why bring him in ?
We needed match winners and he doesn't fit that bill,
Wouldn't think for a minute that Jokanovic even knew who he was so who had the idea to sign him ? Can only be Rigg.

Agree, Agree. Although at the time I thought Baird would be a good loan signing and was happy to see him back, I havent been impressed with him

[Mince n Tatties]

What I found very frustrating at the time and said so on here was the loan signing of Chris Baird,
Why ?
Against Burnley the other night we had Richards, Ream and Baird all on the bench, again why ?
Under what circumstances would you need all 3 when you've already got 3 centre half's on the pitch,
Baird for me was a massive waste of a loan signing for me, he wasn't better than what we already head, so why bring him in ?
We needed match winners and he doesn't fit that bill,
Wouldn't think for a minute that Jokanovic even knew who he was so who had the idea to sign him ? Can only be Rigg.

Agree, Agree. Although at the time I thought Baird would be a good loan signing and was happy to see him back, I havent been impressed with him

Correct.
People getting carried away,living in the past.
He is no better than anyone here,and that's not
saying much about them.

[MJG]

What I found very frustrating at the time and said so on here was the loan signing of Chris Baird,
Why ?
Against Burnley the other night we had Richards, Ream and Baird all on the bench, again why ?
Under what circumstances would you need all 3 when you've already got 3 centre half's on the pitch,
Baird for me was a massive waste of a loan signing for me, he wasn't better than what we already head, so why bring him in ?
We needed match winners and he doesn't fit that bill,
Wouldn't think for a minute that Jokanovic even knew who he was so who had the idea to sign him ? Can only be Rigg.

I can understand having those three on bench. Richards to cover  a  full back who's fitness for a whole game is a doubt.
Baird for cm
Ream for left side and CB.
All makes sense when having a balanced bench. I might nit like individuals but seems to make sense to me.

[Riversider]

O'hara was on the bench so that's midfield covered , Amorebietta was on the pitch so that's left back covered,
So sorry, Richards, Baird and Ream as subs for a home match makes no sense whatsoever, we had SIX defensive subs at home to Burnley and only one offensive sub (Matt Smith) don't call that a balanced bench !
The loan signings that we brought in should have all been good enough to start, none of Baird, Ince or Labyad are good enough to do that.
Big wasted opportunity for me.

[Chutney]

What I found very frustrating at the time and said so on here was the loan signing of Chris Baird,
Why ?
Against Burnley the other night we had Richards, Ream and Baird all on the bench, again why ?
Under what circumstances would you need all 3 when you've already got 3 centre half's on the pitch,
Baird for me was a massive waste of a loan signing for me, he wasn't better than what we already head, so why bring him in ?
We needed match winners and he doesn't fit that bill,
Wouldn't think for a minute that Jokanovic even knew who he was so who had the idea to sign him ? Can only be Rigg.

I can understand having those three on bench. Richards to cover  a  full back who's fitness for a whole game is a doubt.
Baird for cm
Ream for left side and CB.
All makes sense when having a balanced bench. I might nit like individuals but seems to make sense to me.

The is no reason at all to select three defenders on the bench.

[@jolslover]

O'hara was on the bench so that's midfield covered , Amorebietta was on the pitch so that's left back covered,
So sorry, Richards, Baird and Ream as subs for a home match makes no sense whatsoever, we had SIX defensive subs at home to Burnley and only one offensive sub (Matt Smith) don't call that a balanced bench !
The loan signings that we brought in should have all been good enough to start, none of Baird, Ince or Labyad are good enough to do that.
Big wasted opportunity for me.

What makes you say that? Agree about Baird but Ince started every game for Brighton in a season they finished 5th. and Labyad came here with a huge reputation. How can you judge either of them after literally around 40 minutes of football??

[MJG]

What I found very frustrating at the time and said so on here was the loan signing of Chris Baird,
Why ?
Against Burnley the other night we had Richards, Ream and Baird all on the bench, again why ?
Under what circumstances would you need all 3 when you've already got 3 centre half's on the pitch,
Baird for me was a massive waste of a loan signing for me, he wasn't better than what we already head, so why bring him in ?
We needed match winners and he doesn't fit that bill,
Wouldn't think for a minute that Jokanovic even knew who he was so who had the idea to sign him ? Can only be Rigg.

I can understand having those three on bench. Richards to cover  a  full back who's fitness for a whole game is a doubt.
Baird for cm
Ream for left side and CB.
All makes sense when having a balanced bench. I might nit like individuals but seems to make sense to me.

The is no reason at all to select three defenders on the bench.

who was the third defender on Tuesday? Baird has joined and played as a cm.

[MJG]

O'hara was on the bench so that's midfield covered , Amorebietta was on the pitch so that's left back covered,
So sorry, Richards, Baird and Ream as subs for a home match makes no sense whatsoever, we had SIX defensive subs at home to Burnley and only one offensive sub (Matt Smith) don't call that a balanced bench !
The loan signings that we brought in should have all been good enough to start, none of Baird, Ince or Labyad are good enough to do that.
Big wasted opportunity for me.

What makes you say that? Agree about Baird but Ince started every game for Brighton in a season they finished 5th. and Labyad came here with a huge reputation. How can you judge either of them after literally around 40 minutes of football??

I've watched Labyad in his two u21 appearances and has done nothing of note.

[Chutney]

What I found very frustrating at the time and said so on here was the loan signing of Chris Baird,
Why ?
Against Burnley the other night we had Richards, Ream and Baird all on the bench, again why ?
Under what circumstances would you need all 3 when you've already got 3 centre half's on the pitch,
Baird for me was a massive waste of a loan signing for me, he wasn't better than what we already head, so why bring him in ?
We needed match winners and he doesn't fit that bill,
Wouldn't think for a minute that Jokanovic even knew who he was so who had the idea to sign him ? Can only be Rigg.

I can understand having those three on bench. Richards to cover  a  full back who's fitness for a whole game is a doubt.
Baird for cm
Ream for left side and CB.
All makes sense when having a balanced bench. I might nit like individuals but seems to make sense to me.

The is no reason at all to select three defenders on the bench.

who was the third defender on Tuesday? Baird has joined and played as a cm.

Regardless of the position he played, baird is a defender.

[MJG]

What I found very frustrating at the time and said so on here was the loan signing of Chris Baird,
Why ?
Against Burnley the other night we had Richards, Ream and Baird all on the bench, again why ?
Under what circumstances would you need all 3 when you've already got 3 centre half's on the pitch,
Baird for me was a massive waste of a loan signing for me, he wasn't better than what we already head, so why bring him in ?
We needed match winners and he doesn't fit that bill,
Wouldn't think for a minute that Jokanovic even knew who he was so who had the idea to sign him ? Can only be Rigg.

I can understand having those three on bench. Richards to cover  a  full back who's fitness for a whole game is a doubt.
Baird for cm
Ream for left side and CB.
All makes sense when having a balanced bench. I might nit like individuals but seems to make sense to me.

The is no reason at all to select three defenders on the bench.

who was the third defender on Tuesday? Baird has joined and played as a cm.

Regardless of the position he played, baird is a defender.

well Richards thinks hes a midfielder so that balances out then.
Fact is Baird has not played in defence for us since he came back.

[westcliff white]

O'hara was on the bench so that's midfield covered , Amorebietta was on the pitch so that's left back covered,
So sorry, Richards, Baird and Ream as subs for a home match makes no sense whatsoever, we had SIX defensive subs at home to Burnley and only one offensive sub (Matt Smith) don't call that a balanced bench !
The loan signings that we brought in should have all been good enough to start, none of Baird, Ince or Labyad are good enough to do that.
Big wasted opportunity for me.

What makes you say that? Agree about Baird but Ince started every game for Brighton in a season they finished 5th. and Labyad came here with a huge reputation. How can you judge either of them after literally around 40 minutes of football??

I've watched Labyad in his two u21 appearances and has done nothing of note.

when I was living and working in Brussels for 3 years I saw a bit of dutch football at weekends, going to games most weekends. Labyad can play, he has some issues attitude wise that's for sure but strict managers have dealt with that with him. I would say he needs a manager (and maybe fans) who believes in him

[MJG]

Now if you wanted to argue why did we have three cm's on the bench Tuesday than I would agree