News:

Use a VPN to stream games Safely and Securely 🔒
A Virtual Private Network can also allow you to
watch games Not being broadcast in the UK For
more Information and how to Sign Up go to
https://go.nordvpn.net/SH4FE

Main Menu


Fulham and Shahid Khan look for answers with League One abyss nearing

Started by Friendsoffulham, March 28, 2016, 04:10:15 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Friendsoffulham

Fulham and Shahid Khan look for answers with League One abyss nearing


The American businessman Shahid Khan flew into London during the international break to focus minds on a big problem at Fulham. The thing is, he is not quite sure what the problem is, apart from a lowly league position that means that, if they lose at home to Milton Keynes Dons on Saturday, the club that seemed ensconced in the Premier League when Khan bought it two and a half years ago will fall into the bottom three of the Championship, with relegation into League One an enraging, bewildering prospect.


Khan has never pretended to be a football expert but, as a self-made billionaire, he can make persuasive claims to knowing a shrewd investment when he sees one. And a price of around £150m did not seem bad in July 2013 for a club that had just finished 12th in its 12th consecutive season in England's lucrative top flight.

However, the Premier League is not a closed shop like the NFL, where the Jacksonville Jaguars continue to play and make money despite not having a winning season since Khan acquired them in 2011. In English football failure can be very costly.

As he addressed Fulham's players and staff at the club's Motspur Park training ground last week – geeing them up while contemplating what to do if the club drops even lower – Khan perhaps reflected on an accumulation of blunders that risk turning a storied club into a case study in ineptitude.

It is true that Fulham needed work when Khan took over, as the previous owner, Mohamed Al Fayed, devoted less money to them in his last year before selling up. Khan has funded many well-intentioned changes but results, that most callous of judges, suggest that so far his attempted makeovers have made things worse.

Fulham's relegation from the Premier League was an ugly farce. During that season Khan employed three managers – Martin Jol, René Meulensteen and Felix Magath – before an incoherent team fell with an emphatic thud. Magath was allowed to stay to lead a swift return to the Premier League and was given 14 new players, including the £11m striker Ross McCormack from Leeds United. Seven matches into the Championship season Fulham were bottom, with one point. So Khan ousted the German and installed a five-man search committee to make sure he got the right manager this time. In the interim Kit Symons was promoted from the youth team to run the first team: he did well enough in six weeks to be given the job full-time.

Khan seems to have decided then that another new manager was not enough, that the club needed a stronger sense of direction. That apparently meant two things: first that Alistair Mackintosh, the accountant-turned-CEO, needed to spend less time making football decisions and instead concentrate on commercial matters and the planned stadium redevelopment (plans that may be affected by results over the coming weeks); and second that a powerful "chief football officer" was required.

So in December 2014, two months after appointing Symons, Khan headhunted Mike Rigg, who had been a technical director at Manchester City and Queens Park Rangers before joining the Football Association, where, under the title of head of talent recruitment, he helped devise the playing and coaching philosophy guiding the FA's attempts to establish a unique identity for England's national teams, the so-called England DNA. Trumpeting Rigg's arrival as a major coup, Khan announced that the new man would serve as a sort of director of football "whose sole responsibility was to focus on the short-, mid- and long-term product on the pitch".

Fulham finished 17th in the Championship last season. The charge for a play-off place never materialised and the team's quality and style were still uncertain, though an increased tendency towards long balls could often be discerned and the defence remained prone to self-destruction. Rigg appears to have concluded that Symons would do better with a full pre-season and several new players. The club stress that there was no disagreement over the identity of those players, that Symons was happy to welcome the likes of Tom Cairney, Ben Pringle, Richard Stearman, Tim Ream and Jamie O'Hara. All those signings had a certain pedigree but so far only Cairney has been an indisputable success, the former Blackburn Rovers player bringing midfield creativity not seen regularly at Craven Cottage since the departure of Danny Murphy.

Symons was sacked in November because Fulham did not yet look a proper unit. Sometimes they were formidable, as when they thrashed QPR 4-0 in September, but they rarely performed solidly for a full match and were frequently undone by their preposterous ability to shoot themselves in the foot and an unpardonable sluggishness, as in the 3-0 home defeat by Wolves four days later. After a 5-2 home trouncing by Birmingham City, Symons was let go. Rigg had no one lined up to replace him.

Steve Clarke, Nigel Pearson and Mark Warburton were among those who decided not to go for the job and during the next seven matches, under two different caretaker managers, Fulham did not win and fell from 12th to 18th. If this was stability and progress, their disguises were masterful.

When the new manager, Slavisa Jokanovic, was finally appointed just after Christmas he knew he could not improve the squad with January purchases because of a transfer embargo imposed on Fulham for breaching the Football League's financial fair play rules the previous season. Jokanovic has found it hard going, winning three of 16 matches so far. Last month, however, the team's most coveted player, McCormack, demonstrated his belief that the club is now on the right track by signing a new contract and declaring, rather damningly for what had gone before, that "the manager is starting to mould a style of play into us and the lads are pulling in the same direction, which maybe hasn't been the case ... the intensity in training has gone up since he has come in. There seems to be a method to what he is doing."

Alas, Fulham have not won since McCormack said that and two weeks ago they were beaten at home by Bristol City in a match that Jokanovic labelled a "must-win" in the fight against relegation.

Fulham could go anywhere from here. It is still easy to make a case for their survival: after all, despite their position they are the second-highest scorers in the league, thanks mostly to the strikeforce of McCormack and Mousa Dembélé; and some of the loan signings they were permitted to make in January look good, especially Michael Madl, the Austria international centre-back brought in from Sturm Graz.

That signing was influenced by Craig Kline, who, after impressing Khan at Jacksonville with a unique statistics-based recruitment model, was drafted in to work under Rigg at Fulham. The club insist there is no clash of duties between the two recruitment specialists. Rohan Ince, brought on loan from Brighton in January, has also made an impact, opening the scoring in the team's last match, a 1-1 draw at Birmingham.

Jokanovic had put a priority on solidity against Birmingham and the team were generally tighter and more energetic. But eventually they conceded when the 6ft 5in Dan Burn was beaten to a header by Michael Morrison, a player eight inches shorter. That sort of defensive lapse has been a defining part of Fulham's identity for nearly three years. That is the main reason why MK Dons will travel to Craven Cottage with optimism.

Fulham's chronic defensive problems appear to be mental. Players such as Burn, Stearman, Ream, Luke Garbutt and Fernando Amorebieta have qualities but they, and many others, have made costly mistakes. Questions must be asked about the preparation of a team that has conceded 29 goals from set pieces this season, more than double that of most other teams in the Championship (except Charlton, 25, and Rotherham, 16). Maybe, as McCormack indicated, there was a lack of focus and rigour for too long. Maybe confusion from above has made players timorous and rash.

Fulham have looked particularly jittery at Craven Cottage, where they have lost half their league games this season and the atmosphere verges on hostile. MK Dons will not try to silence their hosts but will hope to hear the groans, swears and howls that are now common in a ground that used be an admired Premier League venue but risks becoming London's swankiest League One destination.

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/mar/28/fulham-shahid-khan-league-one-

bobby01

Watching the ups and downs since 1958, wouldn't have it any other way, what a roller coaster of a club.

jarv

Having read this, anyone else have that sick, empty feeling in their stomach? Absolute disgrace, the management team. Organising a party in a brewery springs to mind.


FPT

It's a really sensible, well analysed piece.

I particularly enjoy the line of, "Khan has funded many well-intentioned changes but results, that most callous of judges, suggest that so far his attempted makeovers have made things worse."


mike_corkcity12

Khan should be mostly praised for redeveloping Motspur and his continued investment in the youth set up. I know for a fact that Jennings has had several good offers but Khan has gone all out to keep him. I wonder how Jennings would have done as Director of Football. He certainly seems like a very competent individual.

It seems like if we drop then Khan will looks to sell up. I'm not one to hope people lose their job or anything like that, but it really is time for Macintosh to go. Leadership comes from the top and he has been awful.


nose

craig kline and mike rigg, the gruesome twoesome!
They wouldn't know a good footballer if he bit them on the leg

i think that with mr khan, unfortunately we are doomed to league one football and then league two. the man does not have a clue and will not bring on proper people that do

kline is a disgraceful negligant joke of a man because the method is wrong

the lord protect5 us from such incompetence

the offer to talk to mr khan remains open and i am available to assist, it ain't that difficult.

The Swan

This report is not new. Nearly all Fulham supporters have the same view.

We the supporters know the problem why can't the management and the coach see it as well.
The Swan

mike_corkcity12

Quote from: nose on March 28, 2016, 05:38:55 PM
craig kline and mike rigg, the gruesome twoesome!
They wouldn't know a good footballer if he bit them on the leg

i think that with mr khan, unfortunately we are making repetitive replies that aren't funny!  to league one football and then league two. the man does not have a clue and will not bring on proper people that do

kline is a disgraceful negligant joke of a man because the method is wrong

the lord protect5 us from such incompetence

the offer to talk to mr khan remains open and i am available to assist, it ain't that difficult.
what are you babbling on about?


Patrick

fyi....Kline is no longer at FFC...he was sent back to the US some months back......good article though....pretty much sums up the current situation.....

RaySmith

All the  article says is that no one really knows what the problem is.

But it does hint at the panic and uncertainty that has lead to constant, unsuccessful, managerial changes, and consequent bad results and loss off confidences, with no strong leadership from above.

I think that sacking Kit, certainly at that time and with no suitable replacement lined up, was the latest mistake, and that that could cost us dear.

However, I believe that the team has enough quality and fight to get us out of this mess. I think that we can escape and turn the corner, and it will be different next season under Joka.

COYW!

nose

Quote from: Statto on March 28, 2016, 05:59:12 PM
Quote from: mike_corkcity12 on March 28, 2016, 05:45:10 PM
Quote from: nose on March 28, 2016, 05:38:55 PM
craig kline and mike rigg, the gruesome twoesome!
They wouldn't know a good footballer if he bit them on the leg

i think that with mr khan, unfortunately we are making repetitive replies that aren't funny!  to league one football and then league two. the man does not have a clue and will not bring on proper people that do

kline is a disgraceful negligant joke of a man because the method is wrong

the lord protect5 us from such incompetence

the offer to talk to mr khan remains open and i am available to assist, it ain't that difficult.
what are you babbling on about?

Indeed
Of all the things Khan has done in the last three years I think following Kline's recommendation and signing Madl is probably much the only thing I wouldn't criticise him for

i totally agree madl is a great fond! But like all scatter gun techniques, occasionally you will get lucky. kline's methodology is grossly flawed


nose

Quote from: Patrick on March 28, 2016, 06:20:16 PM
fyi....Kline is no longer at FFC...he was sent back to the US some months back......good article though....pretty much sums up the current situation.....

we were al pleased to learn that when it happened but you are correct to point out that he has gone back. unfortunately he may return for the next transfer window to wreak more damage

nose

Quote from: RaySmith on March 28, 2016, 06:35:04 PM
All the  article says is that no one really knows what the problem is.

But it does hint at the panic and uncertainty that has lead to constant, unsuccessful, managerial changes, and consequent bad results and loss off confidences, with no strong leadership from above.

I think that sacking Kit, certainly at that time and with no suitable replacement lined up, was the latest mistake, and that that could cost us dear.

However, I believe that the team has enough quality and fight to get us out of this mess. I think that we can escape and turn the corner, and it will be different next season under Joka.

COYW!

it says the pronlem is not known, there are at least a dozen of us on here that totally understand the problem and two or three have a simple solution. however mr khan is so clueless he doesn't realise that the root cause of our problem remains in situ.

rubbernecca

Quote from: nose on March 28, 2016, 06:43:46 PMit says the pronlem is not known, there are at least a dozen of us on here that totally understand the problem and two or three have a simple solution. however mr khan is so clueless he doesn't realise that the root cause of our problem remains in situ.

Khan obviously doesn't treat Fulham as a passion or a business otherwise he wouldn't delegate the running of it to con men. Are there any other teams run by a disinterested billionaire? Has apathy ever been a winning strategy? Has a giant flaccid cock ever been effective?


SG

But it isn't just one problem. Poor coaching, ineffective players, lack of motivation, inadequate tactics, to name a few. Add the problems of who is really running the football side of the club and we have a fine mess.
Funnily enough out of all this I believe at long last we have the right manager even if his start has not been as effective as I hoped.

love4ffc

I don't think Khan is deliberately trying to ruin Fulham.  Instead I do think he is trying to do what is right for Fulham.  However I do not think he fully sees some of his mistakes and knows how to deal with them. 

Really think Khan needs a complete shakeup starting with the CEO and the board.  Alistair needs to go.  We need someone new with experience in running a successful club.  What we don't need are the leftovers that got the sack from Man City.  Having a finance/accountant is not a bad thing so could see Mr. O'Loughlin staying.  Khan wants to keep Mark Lamping on the board fine but he needs to add at least two more board members along with a new CEO.  The board members need to have actual footballing experience and be preferably Fulham fans. 

You'll only get change when real changes are made. 
Anyone can blend into the crowd.  How will you standout when it counts?

Wearethewhites

Kahn isn't passionate about FFC, well, not like Fayed was anyway. He likes to be involved, or so he says, but his heart isn't in it like the Jaguars. To Kahn, FFC is a business model, currently a failing one, and he's approaching it like one as well. Until he starts approaching us like and Football Club, and a proper Football owner, then, he may actually starting getting somewhere.

Would like to be proved wrong, but personally, I don't think he has it in him.


Jack Fulham