Who would you prefer gone?

[Fulham 442]

What are your thoughts everyone?

[South Coast White]

Where's the option for both!!!

[Fulham 442]

Where's the option for both!!!

There isn't one!!

[Mr White]

Where's the option for both!!!

There isn't one!!

Why not !!

[Fulham 442]

Where's the option for both!!!

There isn't one!!

Why not !!

I just thought it would make for a more interesting poll if we could only choose one to go....

[Bassey the warrior]

Both.

[Penfold]

Both!

[ron]

Both.

[toshes mate]

Both.

[bobby01]

Both

[KingofCheese]

Yep lets get rid of the Khans and get back to the good old days of Fulham 2000 - we were an honest side in those days before big money spoilt everything.

[ron]

Not the Khans, ie Shad Khan, just the positioning of TK, who is instrumental in the formation of an impenetrable barrier to progress at the club.

[bobby01]

It does say tk, so I presumed it means as dof.

[KingofCheese]

Not the Khans, ie Shad Khan, just the positioning of TK, who is instrumental in the formation of an impenetrable barrier to progress at the club.

Lets think ...who could have put TK in charge...um..oh yes his Dad and he might be miffed if his decision is constantly being questioned. Its just an opinion...

[ron]

Not the Khans, ie Shad Khan, just the positioning of TK, who is instrumental in the formation of an impenetrable barrier to progress at the club.

Lets think ...who could have put TK in charge...um..oh yes his Dad and he might be miffed if his decision is constantly being questioned. Its just an opinion...

He'd be miffed right up to the point when he realised moving his son improved the value of his investment in the club.

[GrumpyWhite]

Both

[blingo]

BOTH

[FulhamStu]

I voted get rid of TONY, but that does not mean hound him out of the club.  Give him a job he can do and that suits his qualifications better.   I am sure he has many things he can do to help move the club forward but in charge of football matters strikes me and many others as not really matching his skill set.

[Fulham 442]

Not the Khans, ie Shad Khan, just the positioning of TK, who is instrumental in the formation of an impenetrable barrier to progress at the club.

Lets think ...who could have put TK in charge...um..oh yes his Dad and he might be miffed if his decision is constantly being questioned. Its just an opinion...

He'd be miffed right up to the point when he realised moving his son improved the value of his investment in the club.

Agree with both of your posts Ron.

[HobGoblin]

Not the Khans, ie Shad Khan, just the positioning of TK, who is instrumental in the formation of an impenetrable barrier to progress at the club.

Lets think ...who could have put TK in charge...um..oh yes his Dad and he might be miffed if his decision is constantly being questioned. Its just an opinion...

He'd be miffed right up to the point when he realised moving his son improved the value of his investment in the club.

Agree with both of your posts Ron.

Agreed also, I beleive that SK would sell the club rather than tell his son he isn't involved any longer. I doubt we'd be as lucky with another owner than we have been with the last two.