The 'Views' Of Stoke's Fans

[White Noise]

Having a pop at Pantsil on this one - plus other rubbish -

http://oatcakefanzine.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=Potters

Here they were hoping Dembele played so they could crock him again -

http://www.delilahsforum.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=3503

[Aldo]

I see one of them has mentioned Hangeland as a replacement for Huth! A bit up themselves aren't they!

[ron]

Having a pop at Pantsil on this one - plus other rubbish -

http://oatcakefanzine.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=Potters

Here they were hoping Dembele played so they could crock him again -

http://www.delilahsforum.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=3503

"Oatcakefanzine"....? What with some of the semi-literate and foul-mouthed rants on there, I would have thought "Fruitcakefanzine" may have been more appropriate.

[Lighthouse]

Hangeland is MOM and 'immense'. Not bad comments from them.

[Burt]

Blimey... That oatcake board is clearly for retards.

[Rambling_Syd_Rumpo]

horrible little team,with horrible, oafish, thuggish, clueless, thoughtless, brainless, classless, charmless,toothless little oiks of fans-apart from that they're lovely  :001: :001: :028:

[Aldo]

horrible little team,with horrible, oafish, thuggish, clueless, thoughtless, brainless, classless, charmless,toothless little oiks of fans-apart from that they're lovely  :001: :001: :028:

A bit biased there I think RSR! They have some bad features too!

[Rambling_Syd_Rumpo]

horrible little team,with horrible, oafish, thuggish, clueless, thoughtless, brainless, classless, charmless,toothless little oiks of fans-apart from that they're lovely  :001: :001: :028:

A bit biased there I think RSR! They have some bad features too!

:011: :011: :011: :011: :59:

[sipwell]

I think our admins are happy we are such an eloquent, well-mannered bunch   :022: :

Perhaps we should give them value  for their hard work too  :airfix:

[Rambling_Syd_Rumpo]

the first year stoke came up and played at the Cottage, walking through the park after a game I had to "get involved" with about 5 stoke fans(all in their 40's and 50's) abusing and threatening a Fulham supporting dad with his daughter(about 11/12) so yes,I'm sure everyone's happy that we are a well mannered bunch,it's just a shame that some other teams supporters aren't-Stoke fans have a "reputation" and they make a point of living up to it!

[White Noise]

The last time we beat Stoke at their place was 1969.

Anyone see that one?

[LordNelson]

A worthless lot.

[Mr Fulham]

A worthless lot.

Yeah.....do they really believe what they say?
I have serious doubts...

Said the same to my Dad - Murphy has the gall to have a pop at us yet his team combined the art of physicality and blatant cheating to perfection.

Pantsil is a disgrace to the game

:dead horse:

[RidgeRider]

How would you like to 'moderate' that lot. Wow, talk about train wreck of a board.

[Supermitch]

The last time we beat Stoke at their place was 1969.

Anyone see that one?

That was the last time in the top flight.  Today's was only the 3rd top flight match we've had there since 1969!

We won at the Britannia in 1999 thanks to a late Kit Symons goal - I was at that one but not the old Division 1 match.
:011:

[SmithyFFC]

What a nice lot they are.....

[GoldCoastWhite]

I thought we were a lot more physical than usual but we needed to be. Our lads refused to be bullied and their lot reacted as bullys usually do when someone stands up to them. "They don't like it up 'em Captain Mainwaring !"

[JBH]

Blimey... That oatcake board is clearly for retards.

The whole of the City of Stoke is full of Retards  :028:

[BalDrick]

I see one of them has mentioned Hangeland as a replacement for Huth! A bit up themselves aren't they!

I'm sorry - one of them is suggesting they buy Hangeland? *falls off chair laughing*